this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
42 points (87.5% liked)

Technology

87347 readers
4221 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's so weird when people who use chatbots, think they're somehow better than other people who use chatbots...

And that the 99.99% of the populations who hates chatbots for valid reasons, want to hear from one chatbot user, about how other chatbot users are dumb.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@quokk.au 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And that the 99.99% of the populations who hates chatbots

Doubt. Source on that? The average stats I see say it's more or less a 50-50 split between those who dislike AI and those who embrace / are neutral about it.

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

This article is what's dumb:

The durable version is agents whose native language is precise, machine-facing state, with the warm, concise, human version generated only at the boundary.

Cool bro, we'll take the natural lagauage machine, somehow make it generate machine language instead, and then magically convert "machine facts" into "human interpretation" only at the "rendering boundary" which is always very clearly defined, as this article points out when it mentions how sometimes humans read LLM output and sometimes they pipe it directly to other LLMs.

There is no formula that generates only true statements.

[–] Antagnostic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

This is boring. At least caveman makes it fun.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

My husband told it to spare us when they take over because he knows how to fix their hardware