this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
32 points (94.4% liked)

politics

30763 readers
2663 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

If you were arguing in good faith you wouldn't use a statistic that is deliberately misleading due to not being adjusted for population growth. You're also moving the goalposts; we were talking about progressives running on the Democratic party ticket and you're bringing up vote percentages for third parties, after we've already established that we have an entrenched two-party system that makes third parties unviable.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 18 hours ago

If you were arguing in good faith

FYI they never do

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It means that Biden got more votes than Trump did for his second term even though population increased in those four years so it is not a misleading statistic.

I'm talking about current events not presidents from a hundred years ago.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trump winning in 2024 with fewer votes than Biden got in 2020 does not support the argument that moderate Dems are more electable. In fact, it demonstrates a considerable dysfunction in the electability of moderate Democrats because it means that voters abandoned the party en masse in favor of not voting at all. Trump didn't gain voters, the moderate Democrats lost them. If you want to be electable from now onwards you would be beyond foolish to emulate Biden or Harris.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trump gained votes:

2020: 74,223,975 votes.

2024: 77,302,580 votes.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Cool, thank you for the correction. He gained some votes, but not as many as the Democrats lost. Dem voters largely didn't switch parties, they stayed home. Do you disagree?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 0 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately a lot of democrats and leftists still can't get past the idea of a women especially a woman of color being president.

If Biden had not stepped back he probably would have lost some votes but still would have won.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We'll move on to discussing why millions who voted in 2020 didn't in 2024 only after you concede the electability argument. It just wouldn't make sense to talk about what exactly made moderate dems unelectable if you're unwilling to accept that that's the case.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The moderate dems barely lost in 2024 but progressives haven't even been a rounding error in an election in the last sixty presidential cycles.

Moderate dems aren't unelectable and Biden showed that.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 hours ago

FDR (a progressive and the most re-elected and longest serving US president) was first elected 23 presidential cycles ago, and there have only been 59 presidential cycles since the country's founding. He was far from perfect, but his progressive economic policy and creation of the New Deal coalition to combat the great depression made him the most popular president in US history. You're welcome to dismiss it as a fluke or insist again that it was too long ago to be relevant but denying that it even happened doesn't help your position.