this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
449 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

87279 readers
4376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 78 points 4 days ago (4 children)

If you are NOT on a government watch list by now, you should be ashamed of yourself.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 36 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I was going to suggest that maybe a person managed to simply have absolutely zero online presence, but then I realized that having zero online presence probably gets you on a watchlist itself.

[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Too much online presence, watchlist

No online presence, believe it or not also watchlist

[–] RogueBanana@piefed.zip 5 points 4 days ago

Moderate online presence? You guessed it.

[–] speculate7383@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago

straight to gel

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This confusion of what is right and what is wrong happens when oppression is in control.

It doesn't matter what you did, it was WRONG.

We are being oppressed by OUR government.

[–] belochka@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Watch lists are so 1937. The whole point of building datacenters for that kind of thing is to not have the separation between people on watch lists and people not on watch lists.

So nobody should be ashamed by your measure. We live in a wonderful time when, instead of selecting few suspicious individuals to monitor, you can monitor everyone automatically and don't have that risk.

It's like lossless encoding, like FLAC, versus lossy encoding, like MP3. It's better to have the former if your resources allow it.

Watch lists have that downside of being a Russian roulette, what if your watch lists give you a wrong impression of the society outside the watch lists? You might think you have it under control, while you don't.

With everyone being monitored if you think you have it under control, you really do.

That just was a bit too expensive, but times they are a-changing.

That's really nice, isn't it?

[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hear me out:

Fuck ICE!

Yay I made it on the list! I hope you’re proud of me.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

Good boy, or girl...good nullify3112.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Or start small with the Tesseract blocklist