this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

13389 readers
33 users here now

All things programming and coding related. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey all! My team at work is struggling with growing pains of getting into a formalized review process, so I was wondering if any of you guys have some things to live or die by in your code reviews. How much of it is manual, or how much is just static code analysis + style guide stuff, etc?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] pattern@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So we use that, and that works well. What does your peer review process look like? Is it pretty loosy-goosy, or do you have hard and fast guidelines and checklists?

[โ€“] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Its pretty much loosy-goosy with only a limit of how many checks are required (including a fully built build) to be able to merge.