this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
635 points (89.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21428 readers
748 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] ShranTheWaterPoloFan@startrek.website 66 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    Mastering? It's an OS not a skill.

    Are really looking down on people because you open the terminal often instead of being able to click something?

    [–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I use Mac and also open terminal often. Then again, I’m a software engineer and I have work to do, that doesn’t include trying to troubleshoot problems with my OS.

    [–] itsJoelle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm in the same position. My Linux machine is for gaming and .... Interesting tasks that could be hazardous to set up on my Mac.

    The hardware quality is sublime as well. However, dailing Linux for a bit and going back to MacOS made me appreciate it more. Homebrew is a hair slow tho 😂

    [–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Interesting tasks that could be hazardous to set up on my Mac.

    Avast! Nothing interesting to see here mateys. It just be a Linux server serving...files. The legally obtained kind, I might add. Yarrr!

    [–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

    Made my day. Yarr!

    [–] itsJoelle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

    Plus the Mac is a wee skiff in the open sea.

    [–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Homebrew is so convenient, yet so ridiculously slow.

    [–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

    There is a option to not install the kitchen sink when you brew install... I forgot what it is though...

    [–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Kindly extrapolate on the more hazardous workloads you Linux machine runs

    [–] itsJoelle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

    Whoa buddy, easy with the hard R!

    [–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I used to use ~~MacOS~~ OS X in the mid-2000s, and the reason why I liked it was precisely because it was the best UNIX.

    It's a shame Apple moved away from things like bash, Applescript, Automator, Xserve, machines with toolless chassis and good upgradability, etc.

    [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    There's a better timeline where Woz was also brought back to Apple, OS X was just another linux distro that came with Apple's very nice hardware, and the combined Linux and Mac user space meant game devs would take it seriously. Also, Mac/linux had a real foothold in the educational space again.

    Omg this gave me goosebumps to read. That would have been amazing!!!

    [–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Yeah, and that shift from copyleft to permissive (bash is GPL-licensed; zsh is MIT-licensed) is emblematic of Apple going from genuinely wanting users to have full control of their system to only begrudgingly tolerating it when they can't stop it entirely. Apple switched precisely because bash upgraded from GPLv2 to GPLv3 and Apple was butthurt about users' rights being better protected.

    [–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Mastering? It's an OS not a skill.

    Linux skills are often a requirement of sysadmin jobs.

    [–] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Linux skills

    Windows skills

    OSX Skills

    Can all often be requirements of a job.

    I just want to throw it out there that you can use any of these products and learn a terminal. Often times Mac does better with photo editing and programming in terms of handling the load balance.

    Knowing one or the other doesn't make you any better than the rest.

    It's this community, so yes.

    [–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    The technology labor market disagrees. Careers are built on mastering the Linux OS.

    [–] FinalBoy1975@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

    Wow, really? So, basically, since 1999 or so, I could have had a built up career because I mastered the Linux OS. I have built up a career in something else totally unrelated. Do you think I'd be richer and famouser, too? Maybe I should have just thrown myself at the technology labor market and taken control of it, like I do with the terminal app. snort reapplies tape to broken glasses snort snort readjusts pocket protector prefers platform games with a penguin over a guy with a moustache snort snort

    [–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    In software, it seems incredibly common for companies to give developers MacBooks and then have their software deployed on a linux VM in AWS.

    It's just one of the lower friction corporate options for software companies. The last time I used an institutionally managed linux computer was college.

    There's definitely tech jobs where you need to know linux. But there's also a ton of jobs where you don't have to know much of anything about it beyond common unix stuff, and where OS X specific knowledge is more useful.

    [–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    When time is money, businesses give 0 shits about your Arch install, to be blunt, OSX and Apple are there to do work.... Thay being said, I loves me some Unix Porn 😅 Sorry for the spicy reply. ❤️

    [–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

    Companies generally want something they control, so they can lock your computer and wipe it remotely when they lay you off.

    They care about your arch install because they don't want it any more than your OS X install. Their arch install would be fine, but their JAMF controlled OS X install is probably much cheaper for them to manage, practically speaking.

    [–] kautau@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Because Linux is really good at being a server, and macOS is really good at being a development OS, despite the hate it’s getting in this thread

    [–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I honestly think it has very little to do with the OS itself.

    I think it's more about practicalities and inertia - ordering laptops with the OS preinstalled, administering them, corporate VPN software, etc.

    Both are great development OSs, but OS X is a better corporate OS.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    Disagree on macOS being a really good development OS. It may be so for iOS/macOS development but for many other use cases, package managed Linux OSes are superior. Case in point, macOS has no built-in package manager that can manipulate what toolchains, runtimes and libraries are installed on the system and available for software development. You have to resort to Homebrew or Macports, both of which are inferior options than say apt in Debian-based Linux OSes. And then there's the fact that macOS doesn't support Linux containers without virtualization. Given how useful and how widely used containerization is for software development, it really puts the nails in macOS as a great development OS. Yes you can use containerization but at the expense of significant resource overhead. That's not great at all. I had a 6-container stack to run for development on a MacBook Pro a few years back. It was nearly unusable on that hardware due the RAM overhead and slow macOS<->container IO. The same stack was flying on equivalent hardware running Ubuntu LTS. Beyond that, you can distribute whole consistent development environments fairly easily using Linux OSes and trivially using containers. Having used Windows, Linux and macOS for professional software development, I think macOS is easier to live with for companies without IT departments, but not necessarily as easy to live with for developers. That said people who are used to work with it might find that easier than learning something else even if that something is easier in absolute terms. Which is fine.

    [–] kautau@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Sure, but Linux doesn’t champion good package management. You either resort to the package system of the distro you installed, or slowly switch to flatpak/snap, and then likely the package manager of the language you are developing in. It’s no different to using brew on macOS.

    I would argue basing your entire OS on the package managers makes dev add more friction, not less. Perhaps the only Linux example trying to escape that is nixos, which is nice when you get the hang of it, but it’s a little restrictive. For straight Linux development of course Linux will be the best choice. For straight macOS development of course macOS will be the best choice. For straight windows development of course windows will be the best choice. Distributing docker containers is mostly OS agnostic now, and though you mentioned it, the performance payoff for virtualization on apple M hardware is minuscule.

    Most IT departments at big software companies will opt for macOS for their software devs nowadays, unless they explicitly request Linux. That’s not exclusive, bigger tech companies will let you choose because they have the bandwidth to support multiple OS’s, but they do that because supporting one *nix based OS is much easier than supporting every Linux based distro, with a different package system.

    I’ve used arch. The community repo is amazing, but flawed in its own way. I’ve used Ubuntu, figuring out the PPA system sucks. I’ve used Fedora/Redhat, trying to get deb packages to work when they aren’t in the rpm library is a ride. I’ve used SUSE, Yast is great, and again become frustrating when the package you need isn’t there.

    There are far more variables working with Linux distros, and usually those variables, when you’re just trying to write code, make things more difficult, not easier

    At the end of the day it sounds like we’re tackling very different versions of the dev world anyway. You are trying to emulate Linux servers on apple hardware. I’m writing native apps for iOS and Android that use web views to render our components. Of course macOS wouldn’t be the best for Linux container infrastructure work, but that’s a small subset of the dev work that exists, just as my work is a small subset, however I’d still argue that on a larger scale, macOS is a better dev OS.

    [–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    their software deployed on a linux VM in AWS.

    Precisely one niche where mastering the Linux OS provides bread.

    [–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I mean, imagine running legacy apps... In Tomcat. I've seen into the void...

    [–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

    Don't have to imagine it. 🥲

    [–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

    Are really looking down on people because you open the terminal often instead of being able to click something?

    Uh...No. Of course not. That would be silly.

    It's all in good fun...I hope.

    [–] febra@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Linux people on suicide watch when they see someone using plan9

    [–] shadearg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Eric S. Raymond carved Plan 9's headstone 20 years ago:

    The long view of history may tell a different story, but in 2003 it looks like Plan 9 failed simply because it fell short of being a compelling enough improvement on Unix to displace its ancestor. Compared to Plan 9, Unix creaks and clanks and has obvious rust spots, but it gets the job done well enough to hold its position. There is a lesson here for ambitious system architects: the most dangerous enemy of a better solution is an existing codebase that is just good enough.

    Raymond predicted subsumation as legacy:

    It may well be that over time, much more of Plan 9 will work its way into Unix as various portions of Unix's architecture slide into senescence. This is one possible line of development for Unix's future.

    I wouldn't call these a ringing endorsement of envy.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

    Not many people have actually met that plan9 using guy.

    [–] Psyduck_world@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Plus MacOS is FreeBSD based, it’s no less powerful/complex than Linux.

    [–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    You're fundamentally right, but "no less powerful" is a pretty big stretch, consideration that the majority of the Internet runs on Linux servers, not Mac servers.

    But your point about FreeBSD is right. It's more work, but most software built for Linux will at least run on Mac if you know your compiler flags well enough.

    But if someone tries to spin up web services on a Mac, they're going to have a bad time. So I wouldn't quote say "no less powerful".

    Edit: but I agree with your core point that the meme is silly and way off base.

    [–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    Linux's big competitive advantage in web servers is licensing. You don't have to pay Apple a penny to start up a linux VM, and you don't have to contractually run it on apple hardware.

    In most modern languages, the difference in building your project on linux vs OS X is basically non-existant. I've spent nearly a decade working on backend web services on company MacBooks that get deployed to a linux EC2 instance. Running the server locally makes basically no difference.

    Linux's advantages are more legal than technical.

    [–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

    Agreed that the fundamental advantage is licensing.

    But let's not underestimate the enterprise packaging gulf that this difference has led to.

    It sounds like you and I both could get a full set of web services running on Mac.

    That said, among the diversity of things I've had to get running on Mac, it was a lot less simple than on Linux. Which is why I run as much as possible inside Docker.

    [–] happyhippo@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Zero customisability and plenty of poor defaults.

    My 4k€ company MBP 16" is sitting in my drawer while I use my personal XPS running opensuse. Feel right at home and much more productive than before.

    [–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

    Why not run Linux on it then? Also quick way to make a CSO have a aneurysm, using personal shit for work 😅

    load more comments (11 replies)