700
submitted 1 month ago by RockBottom@feddit.org to c/climate@slrpnk.net

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/51623256

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] morto@piefed.social 27 points 1 month ago

It's funny how he (a university professor from uk) is very probably part of that 10%, but writes as if implied he's not lol. The people in rich countries has really no notion of how rich they are when compared with the rest of the world.

Also, I see that a lot of people around here seem to identify themselves in the top 10%. maybe that explains how I (low-income person from the third world) feel so detached from the community, especially in topics related to tech, as if we lived in different worlds. Well, maybe I really live in a different world than most around...

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"In the United States (EU27), the top 10% contribute 3.1 (2.8) times more to global warming than the average citizen, but 17 (8) times more than the global average"

Top 10% is a salary about $155,000 for an individual or $210,000 for US household. Obviously industrialized countries like China, US, India, Russia, etc admit much higher than the global average.

Please state your approx. income and country so we judge you now.

[-] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 month ago

A university professor in the UK is likely not making that.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It says average salary for a permanent UK professor is around 85k pounds. Top 10% can be as high as 115,000 pounds, but it varies greatly on where you live.

[-] morto@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

Please state your approx. income and country so we judge you now.

I'm from Brazil, and my household (2 people) gets a total of 3200 of local currency (brl) per month, which is 38400 per year, equivalent to about 7470 usd per year. For refecence, the monthly average per capita here is 2264 brl.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Top 10% in Brazil is estimated to be 8k a month but you would probably have more insight than an Internet search so I would appreciate your opinion on that.

What I think is interesting is the assumption that many people you would think aren't in the 10% and how high the 10% actually is. I am sure looking at the top 1% would be an even more extreme version of this.

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
700 points (98.7% liked)

Climate

9029 readers
146 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS