this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
850 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

10348 readers
658 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember a talk by a Microsoft VP who said that a very optimistic estimate would be that we were using human intelligence and creativity at maybe 5% efficiency. The actual number is likely much lower than that.

[–] LuckyBoy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That is pseudo science and a really stupid take. Our brain is expensive as fuck since the moment of conception, born realy early and mostly under developed because of Our fucking big head. The whole evolution says that we animals use it or loose it, let that be tails, guils or brain power.

If we didnt use the whole brain it would be cut off for efficiency.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

Mind the context, we are talking about how little our society is capitalizing on the abilities of people, not on some stupid "we only use 10% of our brain" take

[–] Claidheamh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

Maybe the quote wasn't about the brain, but about human resource management, which would make more sense in the context here?