this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
138 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37748 readers
222 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dawnerd@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Unfortunately probably a lot of CEOs realizing they can make drastic cost cutting and policy moves and get away with it. And sadly looks like it’s working.

[–] Mr_Figtree@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So far it doesn't look like he's getting away with it. Ad revenue is down 60% compared to last year, it doesn't look like there is enough revenue from subscriptions to make up for that, and they're being evicted from one of their offices.

[–] dawnerd@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

No, but the users still keep using it and the bigger advertisers are coming back. It’ll get sold off but love on. Too many people unwilling to let go.

[–] Davel23@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

they're being evicted from one of their offices.

That story is (unfortunately) not as bad as it sounds on the surface. Basically the office they're being evicted from was leased just as COVID lockdowns were happening and WFH became a thing. So no one was actually working there and it was pretty much just sitting empty. It's still not great, but Twitter isn't really losing anything of value.

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Whether or not they actually used the office, they still owed rent, did they not?

[–] Mr_Figtree@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, I see. Maybe one of the offices they're actually using and also not paying the rent on next? A man can dream.

[–] NecoArcKbinAccount@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He hasn't been paying for Twitter's servers, which is the equivalent of a construction company refusing to pay a supplier for wood. No wood = no product, likewise for Elon no servers = no twitter.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well if Google drops him, they know Musk will run to the right wingers in Congress and they will try to fuck with Google again.

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does a right winger not see non payment to be a reason for service to be withheld?

[–] androogee@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's 2023, and you still think they have any principles at all other than naked self-interest?

[–] Renacles@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

He didn't get away with it, he lost a fortune on Twitter and Tesla is being affected as well.

I know he has more money than he could ever lose but he ruined his imagine and that's the main thing he always cared about.