252
Rare Books Shipment Tracked to Amazon AI Facility Where Books Are Allegedly Scanned and Destroyed (www.ibtimes.co.uk)
submitted 5 days ago by A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Amazon is facing fresh scrutiny over the use of physical books for artificial intelligence training after an investigation reportedly tracked a shipment of hard-to-find titles to a company facility in Las Vegas, where workers allegedly cut the bindings from books before scanning their pages and eventually destroying them.

The investigation, reported by 404 Media, involved placing a tracking device inside a book from a large order and following its journey across the United States. The shipment ultimately reached an Amazon facility associated with an operation known as VGT3.

The discovery has raised concerns among booksellers, librarians and readers about what happens to physical books once they are acquired as potential sources of AI training data.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alapakala@quokk.au 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Fascism*
Nazis burning 📚
Modern day book burning

[-] quakki@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago

How is this in any way comparable to that? The bad thing abt nazi book burning wasnt the destruction of physical copies of books, but the destruction of knowledge and their intent behind it

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 1 points 4 days ago

hard-to-find titles

but the destruction of knowledge

[-] quakki@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago
  1. So the only scenario where your think makes sense if we have a seller with a book that is the only unit in existance and it is not digitized.
  2. The bad thing about nazi book burnings was the targetting of the books of political enemies and jewish authors. This isn't the case here. They destroy at most one copy of any book across the board.
[-] alapakala@quokk.au 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
  1. That's what rare & H2F means
  2. Read point one, carefully. If the books weren't rare, it wouldn't have enemies, but more commonly copied. Like the Christian Bible.
[-] degen@midwest.social 2 points 4 days ago

I think their point is that scanning preserves the content rather than destroying it, but I'm guessing the scans aren't exactly public.

Destroying the original is flat out stupid from every angle unless it's unavoidable or destruction (or taking control) is the goal.

Honestly it might be worse if that's not the idea, but yeah it's still nazi coded at best

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 1 points 4 days ago

the scans aren’t exactly public.

Exactly.

destruction (or taking control) is the goal.

Every fascist regime’s is.

nazi coded at best

Now that you know, what are you going to do about this?

[-] quakki@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 3 days ago

Very good you're close to the point. The destruction is a legal neccesity.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 days ago

The same applies here

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
252 points (97.4% liked)

Privacy

6045 readers
627 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com