221

Since the family didn’t want to turn off RCS, I completely changed the app instead😂😂😂

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] artyom@piefed.social -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
  1. This is not "anyone", and definitely not Google or Apple. This is malicious actors doing illegal shit.
  2. You would know if they were doing this as your phone would stop working

Sakari responded to Ars with a statement saying, “We’ve now closed this industry loophole at Sakari

Is SMS insecure? Absolutely. Is Apple, Google, et all maliciously SIM swapping users? Absolutely not. What are you talking about?

[-] bugbear@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago

That was an example, the point is it is possible to intercept it. It's been done in the wild - again that's why there's such need for other methods of 2FA.

Re: Apple or Google That's even easier for them, because, you know, they've got access to the phone. Heck, famously Apple had a bug/feature where it stored text of notifications which affected Signal, too. In that case it was law enforcement who took advantage of that, though.

I wouldn't go around sounding the alarm about SMS, because I don't think many people send stuff that shouldn't be plaintext via SMS. I like using SMS, actually, because how simple it is and you don't need 4G for that.

But the fact is messages can be read one way or another. If you want to conspire, definitely use something else.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

Re: Apple or Google. That's even easier for them, because, you know, they've got access to the phone.

Okay, so no mobile chat apps are safe?

The point here is that Apple and (especially) Google are most certainly collecting your data when using RCS. And only the carriers and the govt are collecting your data in SMS, not Google or Apple.

In that way, I don't think any RCS is superior in any way outside of functionality.

[-] bugbear@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Okay, one last time. Those are two different issues.

The whole point of this thread was that it was possible to intercept the messages. That's all. I doubt the OP needs to worry about that. But it's possible as was stated by the other poster.

It's like claiming that mail can't be intercepted. Of course it can, but generally speaking you don't have to worry about that. Though it would be foolish to claim otherwise (especially when one quick web search can show you cases when someone successfully pulled it off)

Good day.

Edit: typos

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
221 points (92.7% liked)

Android

34612 readers
1104 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the Android community on Lemmy. Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS