11
submitted 3 days ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org

Despite the isolation trans people frequently face and headlines about people turning to chatbots for companionship or even therapeutic support, trans people appear to be turning to AI very rarely and proceeding cautiously when they do.

Trans users have cited various appealing features of chatbots. In one study, researchers from Harvard, Emory, Vanderbilt, and University of California Irvine interviewed 31 people, a mix of cisgender straight people and LGBTQ+ people, about their use of chatbots for mental health support. It quoted a trans individual—the only trans person interviewed—who experienced rejection from friends over their gender and sexuality, who found comfort in responses that indicate there was nothing wrong with them. (The study doesn’t specify their gender or pronouns beyond that they’re trans.)

This respondent told researchers they ask the chatbot “personal questions, like ‘I wanna know if there’s anything wrong with me.’”

I also spoke to Terry, a trans woman who requested we use a pseudonym so she could speak frankly, about her use of chatbots. She highlighted the ability to talk to someone without any judgement. She also said she uses it for sexual fantasies, although she has increasingly run into limits platforms have added around explicit content.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] A_be_seedy@beehaw.org 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm sorry, but what a trash study.

4 universities got together and interviewed 31 people. Averaging 7.75 people each. 1 of the people they interviewed happened to be trans.

The odds of that happening are about 15.86%.

1−((179÷180)^31)

The 4 universities interviewed 384 too few trans people to have any confidence that this trans person represents a majority of the population.

I'm not saying the study is wrong, I just dont have confidence that its representative of anything. And it certainly isn't newsworthy.

Edit: I made this comment, and then realized that the article was more than the 4 paragraphs displayed here. Its been a day, I'm sorry. The article is actually really well written, and the combination of the studies IS newsworthy.

I particularly like the study calling out the dog whistles that go unnoticed on LLMs. I'd be curious to see what the survey looked like and to see how much I'd identify.

I'm glad to see a general trend of AI rejection from the trans community, and I do think its been a sentiment I've seen. I've noticed more so than any other artist that drag queens oppose AI. Musicians don't seem to care as much, but they also represent a much more diverse population.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

7695 readers
3 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS