100
submitted 1 day ago by atomo@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org -5 points 19 hours ago

If the book has no historic value and the digitized copy is complete and freely available, I don't see a problem

[-] atomo@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

Not how it works here, I'm afraid. The book contents will train AI and then is destroyed. Not digital copy is saved. Since these are rare books, all that remains of them is the gibberish AI will vomit when users make questions about the topic once covered by the book.

[-] monotremata@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

I actually think they are saving a copy. They need to be able to redo the training if they come up with a better architecture.

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I know... The "format conversion" is not too big of a concern for me (except for rare books), digital copies can be more accessible... but they only extract raw text so not the full book experience, then never release it.

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Well, two problems then.

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
100 points (96.3% liked)

Fuck AI

8049 readers
947 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS