19
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
19 points (63.4% liked)
United States | News & Politics
9435 readers
499 users here now
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
I dislike the fascist militaries of the world as much as the next guy, but maybe insinuating that someone deserves to get sexually assaulted because of their job is in bad taste.
on the other hand they fucking rape kill and oppress people in the name of a fascist empire.
i'm not shedding a tear for these people in light of what they keep doing to us.
Also, not to belabour the point;
Civilian crewed ships.
So non-combatants.
Without the logistics chain the murder rape machine cannot operate. She is as much part of it as the frontline rapists. "Civilian ships" lol
I am aware, merely suggesting that you don't celebrate the rape of a woman just because of her job.
Maybe don't do the job
Yes a totally normal "job" of killing and raping brown people
And that gives you carte blanche to gleefully mock her being sexually assaulted, does it?
What a pleasant person you are.
Look at you defending a mass rape-murder participant. Very brave.
And look at you celebrating raping people you don't like.
What other occasions do you think it's fun to celebrate someone being raped over? Do you have a list of people you think it's acceptable to rape?
And before you start, I'm not interested in defending any imperialist forces. I'm just curious about the mind of someone who thinks rape is fun sometimes.
Are you going to weep for Epstein associates if they get raped too?
Just give the whole list of people you think would be fun to rape instead of going one entry per comment.
All the people who participate in rape
Wtf are you even saying, her punishment should not be raped by other raping troops that doesn't solve anything.
Yes and in order for that to happen you need to murder-rape militants to not be murder-rape militants because if they're murder-rape militants then they're going to
a) murder
b) rape
So if she doesn't want to get raped she should not be part of the murder-rape militants because that's literally what they do
It's the answer to the question "who raped her".
Yes, and the fact that a woman working with them was raped and the military faced no consequences just incentivises the troops to continue raping because they can do no wrong.
Yes and she is part of that very military. She is one of the rape-terror militants which rapes (mostly non-combatant) women and men all over the world without any consequences. Which brings us to the point of the post. It's because the rape-terror forces face no consequences for rape and terror that the rape-terror force where she got raped isn't facing any consequences when she got raped either.
The solution is to not be part of the rape-terror force. Not try to make it so they only rape people who aren't part of the rape-terror force.
Why are you attacking out against someone from the inside of the literal military industrial complex's belly, publicising what happened? I understand the anger at the system of the horrifying meat grinder, but directing that anger at someone speaking out helps nobody.
If you start to dehumanise them so much that their bodily autonomy is sacrificed, what do you stand for?
Can you stop pretending this woman worked at McDonalds and was actually a mercenary mass murdering brown people for money?
No, I am defending a human being. And questioning why you would say these things about another person, unless you're a literal llm scalping data off people's rage responses to your bait, in which case props to whoever owns you.
It's just a case of not being racist you should try it once.
She was just a woman serving in the rape-terror forces. She doesn't deserve the stuff she's doing to brown untermenschen in the third world.
What the fuck are you trying to advocate for here, materially speaking? That men can and/or should rape women on US navy ships? I don't want to put words in your mouth but that is what it sounds like.
All the "leopard ate my face" liberals come running to defend their favorite Fascist troops.
Answer their question your fucking coward.
I'm not defending the crimes this woman helped perpetrate, I'm asking what material actions you are advocating for.
For example, I believe that the rapist should be punished, this woman needs help with the resulting PTSD, and the entire military needs to be dismantled with appropriate punishments for all involved. Requiring them to do labor rebuilding countries they destroyed would be a good start, with harsher punishment for people doing actual war crimes themselves. Being physically violated by a man who's also an accessory to war crimes is not a valid punishment, it does not advance any of the societal goals of punishment (deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, retribution), to speak nothing of how inhumane and cruel it is.
What about you?
If an ISIS militant gets killed do you also go "well they totally didn't deserve that"?
Killing active-duty US military members to prevent them from engaging in their usual war crimes is OK because it serves a clear goal (incapacitate the soldier, deter other soldiers from joining).
Raping active-duty US military members is not OK because it does not serve any goal, she has PTSD now but that won't stop her from doing more work for the military, and it does nothing to deter men from joining the military (if anything it may be a more enticing proposition for the target audience)
The question is not whether or not someone "deserved" something, it is "which material outcome do we want to achieve".
Because you are refusing to answer my simple question of what you are advocating for, I will assume my initial assumption is correct. It seems the material outcome you want to achieve is terrible suffering for women in US military, not the prevention of war crimes by US military. While understandable that you want to hurt "bad people" like that, it's not helpful at all.
Who raped her but the rape-terror forces she joined herself?
This is peak leapardsatemyface and you're out here saying the person didn't deserve to have their face eaten by a leopard.
Just women? What kind of sexist are you?
You are once again completely ignoring the material reality and instead focusing on whether or not that woman "deserved" to be raped (that phrase has terrible connotations btw, this whole thread needs a large CW on it).
Whether or not someone deserves something is basically emotional and thus idealist, but its material roots are in the total social advantage of giving out a benefit or punishment to a given person. Therefore this is the angle we should take.
If we examine the material outcomes resulting from an active US military member being raped by a colleague, there is very little positive results there. For the victim, trauma does not prevent one from being violent and aggressive, if anything it exacerbates it. The perpetrator meanwhile will be enabled and mentally prepared for even more atrocities against their other victims. For everyone else, it normalizes a horrible behavior that has no place in society.
Then again, even form an idealist angle, I don't think anyone deserves to be raped. Unlike killing, it is never a valid method of defense, because it requires that the target is already overpowered by the perpetrator. It does not serve any possible function other than satisfying the sexual/sadistic/controlling desires of the perpetrator at the expense of the victim.
It also serves as terrorism. Everyone else hears about the r*pe and has to think "that could happen to me" and that's the point. That's why Palestinian prisoners are SAed. It's not just about humiliation and control, it's about sending a message.
But terrorism has blowback. Now it's being inflicted on civilian collaborators, when before it was only inflicted on enemies.
And that blowback keeps coming. These rapists will come home and r*pe us, too. There's a chain of cause and effect.
What "deserved" are you talking about? She joined the rape force and got raped by her own rape force. Did someone but her own rape force rape her? I didn't say you should go and rape the woman. I said she received what she signed up to do to others.
You are the one repeatedly saying all over the thread that she deserved to be raped. You try to be edgy and sarcastic about it but that doesn't change the message.
If you repeatedly say that someone deserves something you are literally implying that we should go do something to people. It is what "deserves" fucking means.
What does leopardsatemyface mean?
That's not an image of her.
Who is it an image of?
Without doing any reverse image searching outside of my own memory its either a zionist standing over a Palestinian teenager or a Guantanamo 'guard' posing next to someone from whichever middle eastern country america was dropping depleted uranium shells on at the time.
Ding ding we have a winner!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabrina_Harman
In human words, please explain how that woman's actions justify any of what you have said.
Are you aware? You sure don't seem to be since you're so empathic towards it. Or let me guess those brown people piled up there aren't human to you
Genuine question, if you’re acting in good faith- are you doing okay? I don’t say this to be rude, but the way you’re behaving in this thread is quite anti-social and I have concern for my fellow netizen.