8
submitted 5 days ago by BlueEther@no.lastname.nz to c/politics
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dave 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's intended to be racist. It's off the back of the Act stuff about immigrants taking too much and stripping areas bare, but we already have other tools to deal with this other than a blanket 10 limit on any kind of shellfish.

You can tell it's intended to be racist because Act are the party of no government interference. They want no regulations and last election literally campaigned (publicly but quietly) on removing any and all building regulations.

Any time they propose adding to regulation you know the intent is to attack a specific group of non-white (or non-cis male) people.

[-] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 3 points 5 days ago

ah yes, I forgot about that.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
8 points (100.0% liked)

NZ Politics

892 readers
2 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other LemmyNZ communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS