204

I'm so confused. Was this intentional? Did AI backfire and they uploaded the output anyway? Was it malicious compliance?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 106 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

And I thought my discovery with their AI gen furniture was bad. Was shopping for a bedframe and found this amongst the mix:

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 110 points 4 days ago

Ah yes, that bedframe must be from the coveted M.C. Escher collection.

[-] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

It would be cool if it were feasible, but I also wanna know exactly what the end product will look like. I've seen a few of these generated pics on Wayfair, and outside of cost, what else would they be reducing by cutting out the physical model and people involved? Like won't the return rate go up and then cost them (significantly) more anyway?

Oh wait, it is just about line go up.

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 7 points 4 days ago

Taking high quality shots isn't cheap, but subsidized slop machine vomit sure is!

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 4 days ago

I'd much rather have low-quality shots of the actual product than AI generated images that may or may not somewhat resemble the actual product.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

A modern smartphone would take a good shot.

They just can't be bothered to mock it up, I guess.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 24 points 4 days ago

If this was real, I'd be so impressed! The impossible geometry clearly indicates... Well, who wouldn't want a non-euclidean bed‽

[-] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

I mean... infinite comfiness? Just gotta find a non-euclidean mattress now.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 8 points 4 days ago

Perfect for bruising your lower leg!

Was this being sold as an actual product?

[-] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

So there's a second image that looks actually plausible. The gables are turned the other way, and the geometry checks out.

[-] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I think that part the reason why it seemed so strange. That image could easily also be AI (like 95% sure), but it's getting really difficult to recognize sometimes. Only tell I found so far was the weird bunny on the shelf facing away from the shot, and the text on the books is too low-res to gauge. The string lights are a bit sus too.

Even if I didn't have a shed full of woodworking tools I wouldn't buy it.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
204 points (97.7% liked)

Facepalm

3673 readers
2 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS