372
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by cannedtuna@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 18 points 2 days ago

The speech wasn't for the officials, it was for the voters, young ones specifically. That's why she mentions re-election at the end.

[-] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub -4 points 2 days ago

Everything I said applies to voters just the same. This type of thing only speaks to the people who already agree. Anyone who is ambivalent isn't going to be motivated by witty snarky whiny voice.

[-] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

In my experience, this kind is speech is very effective for people who already agree with you in principle, but aren’t mad/motivated enough to take action on the issue. I agree is probably not the most effective at changing minds, but as a kind of rallying call it works.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

You must be old. This is how the younger generation communicates.

[-] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub -5 points 2 days ago

Well, I'm old enough to seem old to a 12 year old.

This is how every generation communicates until they're old enough to learn how to communicate.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
372 points (97.0% liked)

Privacy

10668 readers
49 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS