24
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago

No. It's simply an enforcement issue. Police aren't doing their job

If you offer $1000 for every successful report of illegal tabacco and actually pursued the dodgy stores, it provides even smokers with incentive to report

Every non smoker out there is so f**king sick of the tobacco industry.

[-] tankiesmasher@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

It's not "simply" anything. Ofc if you assume police are just lazy that makes sense, but if you acknowledge that law enforcement is operating at capacity it's clear they don't benefit from more reports. They will need to sacrifice more hours sifting through more reports, many of which may be lower quality or even false because of the perverse incentives. Rest assured every store in the country will quickly accrue many reports against it, and police will spend more time investigating innocent stores than guilty ones.

[-] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 4 points 1 day ago

I mean, enforcing bans on illicit substances has always worked so well historically.

[-] blind3rdeye@aussie.zone 3 points 12 hours ago

But anti-smoking laws really have reduced smoking rates - by a lot. So yeah, sometimes that kind of law really does work. In fact it usually does work - just not always.

[-] tankiesmasher@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago

It is kinda weird how the arguments for this can sound like neocons arguing for the war on drugs.

The difference is the policy is working, with smoking continuing to trend down consistently.

[-] king_comrade@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The harder the police enforce, the more clever the market becomes. Violent and brutal crackdowns do nothing to the drug market so why would tobacco be any different?

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

People don't get paid a reward to report those either

It's a cost benefit analysis...

[-] budget_biochemist@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 days ago

As an asthmatic who gets attacks from all forms of smoke, I'd be happy if they outright banned it. Then enforcement would be easy too, anyone smoking would be breaking the law.

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Thankfully (for me) smoking has collapsed in the UK in the last decade or so. A lot of that is down to vaping. Unfortunately, it's almost entirely the conscientious smokers who changed over. The end result is I would rather try and move on a bunch of heroin addicts than a group of smokers. They also have an annoying habit of standing upwind, rather than downwind.

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

That's pretty much spot on.

They were all given the chance to be respectful. You can't even go shopping without breathing in smoke though, and I'm tired of cleaning up cigarette butts, even in parks. It might only be a few people doing it, but the rest of the smoking community aren't holding them accountable

[-] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 0 points 11 hours ago

the rest of the smoking community aren’t holding them accountable

what are your expectations here? how would a smoker hold other smokers accountable ?

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Pretty fuckin easily

When other smokers drop a lit cigarette on the ground they tell them to pick it up. When there are other smokers smoking in front of shops tell them to move, etc.

They can guilt trip them into doing more, and use the threat of being restricted as an excuse

Even helping pick up cigs would be great, but instead us non smokers need to expose ourselves to nicotine.

Instead, none of them care.. all they do is whinge when they do nothing to stop all of this, and politicians are left with no options but to restrict smoking more because many of them act like toddlers and they're putting everyone else's health at risk.

Even with vaping, they had an opportunity. Instead vaping shops were selling to kids, they were leaving their shitty vapes everywhere and many were/are vaping inside and pretending they're doing us a favor by switching to vape and that it's 100% safe.

It's worse than even the gun community

[-] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 0 points 9 hours ago

That's not really how societal norms are maintained though.

Why would a smoker have any more responsibility to correct the behavior of another smoker than a non-smoker would?

If someone is walking their dog, are they expected to pick up all the poo from all the other dogs?

When you're driving do you try to block others who might drive too fast?

When you're at the park, do you intervene when you see someone enjoying a glass of wine in public?

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Dog poo doesn't affect the health of other people.

There is no second hand alcoholism

And yes, when people drive like assholes like prepare to do a dangerous overtake, I'll move my car in a way so they know they can't try it. And I wont block speeding cars. I have called police a few times on cars going dangerously over the limit though

Also, other dog owners are pissed off when people don't clean up the poo.

Smokers have normalized leaving their trash on the ground and harming the health of others. And they don't care when other smokers do it. If smokers aren't going to protect non smokers, laws need to be used to do it for them.

[-] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 0 points 8 hours ago

So in summary... you don't bother correcting the behavior of others at all, you just moan about it online and make up reasons why other people should fix the things you don't like about the world.

Butts on the ground don't effect the health of others.

There's already laws about where people are allowed to smoke in order to avoid harming others.

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Theres a dumb comment. "Oh cigarette butts on the ground don't affect your health"

All the dipshits smoking in front of shops do, and vaping secretly indoors. Which is actually what I said. But nicotine is absorbed through the skin, so it's possible picking up cigarettes is exposing me to nicotine

Looking forward to more smoking bans because entitled dipshit smokers aren't doing the right thing.

They should be banned entirely. My point is that the smoking community doesn't seem to care that other smokers are breaking rules so why should anyone defend their rights to smoke

[-] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 1 points 7 hours ago

I’m tired of cleaning up cigarette butts, even in parks. It might only be a few people doing it, but the rest of the smoking community aren’t holding them accountable

Indeed, a stupid thing to say.

You know you can just back down right?

"Yeah ok, I guess there's not really a smoking community and it's kinda dumb to think that smokers will pick up butts. I just hate people smoking."

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
24 points (85.3% liked)

Australia

5139 readers
363 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS