109
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] the_fuckler@nord.pub 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That makes sense. 70% less material is a staggering amount, that would probably offset if it ran on literal coal and steam. Maybe. That's hyperbolic but you get what I was thinking of.

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
109 points (95.8% liked)

3DPrinting

23664 readers
116 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![]()

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS