35
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2026
35 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
11636 readers
105 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Anyone have any recommendations for a cell service provider that won't just roll over for the government?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qwest
Read the bit about what the government did to the CEO. (canceled contracts and then prosecuted him for lying about revenue) after his refusal of NSA surveillance requests.
It’s not just an issue of them giving up the logs, they have to give them over if there is a warrant.
It’s a matter of them not recording info in the first place. A lot of cellphone providers sell data collected from customers to 3rd parties , including location data (even if you have GPS turned off on your phone, they still know based on your distance from towers).
I’ve heard good things about phreeli. Their pitch is that they don’t keep logs and offer a lot of ways to pay that minimize how much info they have about you, so even with a warrant there’s not much they can hand over. They piggy back off existing networks for good coverage. Worth looking in to if you’re legitimately interested.
I agree that not recording things in the first place is better, but in this case it wasn't a warrant. They could have just said no.
As if any company would do that. Hell, even Ring (the home security camera people) have an open access policy to local police departments.
In this case Google said no. Well really they asked how the request was related to customs, but the effect was not giving the info.
There were a few posts recently about a service provider that was started by a well known privacy advocate. Apparently it just collects zip codes. I believe it's either new or launching soon. It's probably the best bet for privacy, but I can't really vouch for coverage or anything.