36
[CW: Climate change] I do not want to be a doomer but...
(lemmy.dbzer0.com)
Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.
Other anarchist comms
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
Banner by @Val@anarchist.nexus
Come to think of it there is something to be said for small-scale, amateurish, and inefficient operations. It's not practical for a small group of people to replace the industrial machinery of car manufacturing, but we can learn to build, maintain, and repair bicycles — relying on substantially less in the way of manufactured parts from China than would be required for other transportation systems.
Similarly we can't easily replace the entire system of industrial agriculture that's playing its part in wrecking the world, but we can get together with some neighbours to plant and maintain an orchard of fruit trees that will keep on producing stuff for people to eat no matter what happens to international trade and global shipping routes. Why shouldn't we? The idea is not to save the entire world from itself, the idea is to build up the local community, get people more connected to the land and to each other, and with any luck have some nice fruit to eat.
A million such little local experiments, each one seemingly insignificant on the global scale, conducted under whatever hellish conditions the future brings by people desperate to come up with some better way to live — it might add up to something. It is, in any case, something to do.
Small scale co-op bicycle manufacture and repair is eminently feasible. Especially if it's a simple single speed.
The problem with farming is that the world is arguably over-populated, so you need mass scale high tech farming to feed all those people, especially with global soil degradation approaching catastrophic levels and climate change reducing yields.
Small scale farms will never be enough. Also, it would likely actually be more polluting, because you'd end up tilling (which contributes significantly to emissions) or fertilising less productive soil, and need more passes, when you have places where the soil needs relatively little tilling and fertilising. It makes sense to use the most productive soil, in the most efficient way possible, which means large scale and super high tech.
It's really not for the amateurs. Co-op orchards, jam and juice manufacture? Sure. But it'll never be enough. That's best left to the experts.
Again, I'm not out to save the entire world. If anyone thinks they can do that, good luck to them. I'd prefer to work on solving smaller problems than that. Everyone going vegetarian would help at a global scale but making that happen is not something you can feasibly do. Going vegetarian yourself won't fix world hunger or anything, but it's something you can do.
Perfect is the enemy of good.