33
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] waltersf@bookwyr.me -4 points 1 week ago

I only feel vindicated. Hundreds of anarchists, actual leftists, were saying #NoKings was liberal counterrevolutionary/deradicalizing. This is the smoking gun we’ve been saying all along.

[-] Delusions@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

That's in literally no way what anyone in here is saying, or evidenced by the video, so if you feel vindicated you're an idiot

[-] Doom@discuss.online 3 points 1 week ago

It is like that Fauci thing. Republicans came after him in full for... doing his job and being honest.

Every anti-vaxxer went "VINDICATED, I KNEW IT!"

Fuck me. People hear what they want.

[-] waltersf@bookwyr.me -2 points 1 week ago

When’s the revolt?

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Jesse what the FUCK are you talking about

[-] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

Bro, you just came in, said 2+2 is 6, and capped it with a "Checkmate, liberals!" What the fuck does anything you just said have to do with the video? Are you trying to imply that Flock's actions are some kind of liberal plot? That makes zero sense, and it's the most logical take from what you said.

[-] waltersf@bookwyr.me -4 points 1 week ago

Go back to watch every drone to every #NoKings protest.
They were all Flock drones.

[-] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

That still doesn't say anything to support or explain your previous claims.

[-] waltersf@bookwyr.me -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That #NoKings was counterrevolutionary/deradicalizing?
Has anything real changed after these protests?
Is peaceful law abiding protest going to end the illegal abductions, murders, undue process arrests, etc.?

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Weren't you saying that any organization not already taking up arms was counter-revolutionary? How do you counter a revolution that isn't happening yet? Shouldn't we focus on education, agitation, and organization over trying to claim anyone not presently engaged in guerilla warfare is anti-revolutionary? It sounds like you are advocating suicide by cop for the politically aware, which would set everything back.

[-] waltersf@bookwyr.me 1 points 1 week ago
[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I'm aware of the fact that the US state apparatus crushes and delegitimizes organizing efforts. I fail to see why you believe the correct course of action to be, within this context, to launch a guerilla war.

[-] waltersf@bookwyr.me 0 points 1 week ago

me:

two things are necessary to be successful in a revolution . . . an idea in the head, and a bullet in the rifle! The force of action guided by the force of Anarchist thought.
— Kropotkin

u:

launch a guerilla war.

Yakkofr📱

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

How do you get anarchist ideas in people's heads, if not by educating, agitating, and organizing? Wouldn't it be better to form a disciplined revolutionary organization that can do all 3, taking issues like public opposition to Trump to proliferate these ideas? That's what most groups have been using the No Kings protests for. Rallies and protests aren't just going outside, holding a sign, and going home. They come with numerous conversations and recruitment drives that advance these three lines.

[-] waltersf@bookwyr.me 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

At foodbanks, parks, libraries, free free markets, etc.. You have ⅓ of the population unwilling to get educated, agitated, organized. The other ⅓ is destroying educational materials, agitating, and organized. We are the last ⅓, the class conscience educated, agitated, but disorganize group. You won't be agitating the unwilling, or the nazis.

Rallies and protests aren’t just going outside, holding a sign, and going home.

Then how was your recruiting tally? We got zero volunteers. Heck Texas managed to arrest theirs, Utah got some killed, Michiganders got deathcamped. Demagogues are dead set on keeping us killed, burned, and unremembered.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I can't give any numbers, but I can say that educating, agitating, and organizing is still very effective, and remains to be the most critical task. I'd say 5% are actually educated, agitated, and organized, maybe even 1%, or .1%. However, I'd also say that 75% of people are increasingly willing to learn, as conditions continue to decay and organization continues to advance. The rates of organization and radicalization are accelerating.

The way I see it, being unwilling is almost always because someone doesn't yet feel the need to. As imperialism decays, more and more people feel the heat under their feet, and feel the need to understand why. This happens at different rates for different people in different positions, but it is happening. And no, we can't really sway Nazis. At the end of the day, reactionaries exist, and will oppose us.

For clarity, I'm a Marxist-Leninist, not an anarchist. I used to be one, but that's no longer a part of my life. I am simply advocating for effective practice, which even anarchists should be able to copy.

[-] waltersf@bookwyr.me 1 points 1 week ago

The rates of organization and radicalization are accelerating

Where‽

Last time I got detailed that Americans have piss poor OPSEC.

I am myself opossum anarchist: my vanguardism ends with our freedom. No buros, no Trotskyism.
🦨

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

OPSEC is generally poor, which is why disciplined organizations are necessary. As for opposing vanguardism, this just returns us to the problem at hand: how do you educate, agitate, and organize, without building up an organization with both discipline and the will to do so? This is why it seems to me that you are so cynical about everything, you oppose tried and true methods, and at the same time believe that because there is no guerilla war ongoing right now, that the class struggle isn't advancing. It's pure defeatism.

[-] waltersf@bookwyr.me 1 points 1 week ago

OPSEC is generally poor

Until this doesn't improve at an exponential rate, CIA, NSA, FBI, HSI, ICE, Marines, National Guards, state cops & local PDs will keep successfully deathcamping your undisciplined vanguard. I don't oppose vanguarding while revolting. I oppose it after the proletariat is free.

the class struggle isn’t advancing.

because we are seeing the exact opposite advancing: the class unconscious doesn't want to learn. They want to stay performing in social media. They want to keep electoralism. They want to pretend there will be justice served after 2028.

You know the first rule of warfare is securing reliable food. Until that is accomplished, fascism will remain the :amerikkkant: quo. Need not remind you, it's been past a generation of fascism.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I haven't seen mass attacks succeed against the various parties attempting to become a vanguard. ICE fascists and the like brutalizing the people isn't the same as succeeding in arresting organizers, even if some have been explicitly called out by the capitalist state. As for the vanguard becoming unnecessary after the proletariat is free, I agree, but we likely have different views on how the proletariat as a whole and it's vanguard reinforce each other, and what the timeframe for the proletariat becoming actually free is.

As for the "politically unconscious," this is not a permanent fixture. Again, socialism and communism are more popular than ever before in Statesian history. There's no chance that everyone of them understands what these words mean, but plenty of them do, and this number is increasing. People's ideas come from their material conditions, and are largely learned through struggle.

[-] waltersf@bookwyr.me 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I haven’t seen mass attacks succeed against the various parties attempting to become a vanguard

Did you miss the Prairieland Vanguard being sentenced for life?

this number is increasing.

WHERE‽

People’s ideas come from their material conditions,

Material conditions that have NOT been secured. And because they are not secure, Nazis will, and force everyone to ID. There’s no difference fom Putin’s fascism, and today's :amerikkkant:. Just more :amerikkkant: stealing from those they oppress.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I did miss that, yes, because I can't find any reference to a "Prarieland Vanguard" association. I do know that the state has cracked down on groups, but the idea that such an association could be a vanguard is off.

As for the number increasing, it's very well documented, to the point that porkie is terrified.

Material conditions are not to be "secured." When I say people's ideas come from their material conditions, I mean the way we live and our surroundings shape how we think. Living in a moribund empire is radicalizing more people, and if you haven't seen that then I am not sure you've been paying attention.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago

Boosted for the reference to the ~~Nazi Memorial Fund~~ Victims of Communism Memorial Fund.

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
33 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

4972 readers
358 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS