150
I made a Corsi-Rosentha air filter
(lemmy.nz)
Did you make something? Do you want the fleeting rush of endorphins that come with affirmation from strangers? Do you think what you made is neat? Share it here!
Paintings, movies, music, drawings, models, gardens, houses, snowmen, sandcastles - if you made it, you can post it.
RULES:
AI-generated content is banned in all forms.
Some things you make are not to be shared. These include:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, aporophobia, or bigotry of any kind.
- Don't try to sell stuff unless people ask. You can post your Etsy (or similar) if someone prompts you. No spamming self-promotion.
<3
im curious why its so complicated. would taping a filter to both sides of a fan and turning it on be to much stress on the fan?
Having 4 filters in a box setup reduces the strain on the fan and allows for more airflow versus just a single filter. The larger surface area also means everything can run longer before the filters get too clogged.
feels like something that is perfect for 3d printing where all the filters could slide in with a nice cradle on top to fit a standard fan (how standard are box fans?)
The most common box fan size seems to be 20" which is also a super common air filter size so it works out pretty nicely. There's actually a handful of 3D printable frames on printables if you search for Cori Rosenthal
thanks.
You could absolutely print this, but going straight plastic seems wasteful. Theres also the size angle - this thing is big. Mixed material for stuff like this is where it's at IMO. Wood's cheap, won't be here for forever after I'm dead, and is pretty sustainable.
Speaking of which, I intend to design and print some brackets to hold the wooden uprights in place better. Right now it's just the tape holding things together.
But yes, you can more or less slap a single filter on the back of a fan though.
Sure, no one's stopping you from doing that, but it's gonna be less efficient and will put more wear and strain on your fan.
The principle behind the CR design is tipping the scale towards high flow, because when doing the CADR calculation between a low flow HEPA compared to a high flow design with "lower quality" filters often the high flow design wins out. Because of the probabilistic nature of particle capture (Brownian motion and electrostatic capture), you don't need a filter with super small holes to catch super small particles. So using a filter with bigger holes it turns out nets you so much flow, that the extra air changes results in cleaner air than the more restrictive filter.
So I would guess that a single filter would be too restrictive to be as effective.
More surface area = more air flow for a given fan.
which is why wood shops have done this 40 years before 2020.