1453
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 day ago

Too big to fail just also happens to be too big to care.

Competition is good for the consumer and keeps prices low automatically.

[-] disorderly@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

In my opinion, too big to fail means too big to risk it. Nationalize Amazon.

[-] mobyduck648@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Too big to fail == too big to live, at least it would be in a sane world.

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Remember what we did to Ma Bell?

Well I admit, phones were free then. Repairs were free then.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Competition is so rarely a thing though. The barriers to entry are significant enough that if you actually go through them all... why wouldn't you just price shop and then charge about the same as your "competitors"? You don't need to talk to effectively collude.

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

That's entirely dependant on the economy. If the average consumer is doing well then what you are saying does happen.

But if they are not doing well financially, like right now, then stores begin to compete more. I'm starting to see this locally myself in grocery prices. Some things are actually coming down slightly, at least for the moment. I expect with the increasing price of diesel prices will skyrocket again, but maybe we'll get lucky and companies will have to eat the cost this time. Everyone is so broke right now they may not be able to pass the cost on

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

So...read the room.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2026
1453 points (99.5% liked)

Work Reform

17496 readers
1227 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS