8
submitted 3 days ago by Zagorath@quokk.au to c/running@lemmy.world

With this initiative, Chicago follows Paris' lead [though it makes their use optical]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zagorath@quokk.au 4 points 3 days ago

Moving towards less disposable products is good, obviously, but damn I would be annoyed if I was in that Paris marathon targeting a PB and got slowed down by having to wait to fill up.

Mandatory refillable bottles are now ubiquitous in trail running, and I think that's fantastic. It's an environment where targeting specific times makes less sense anyway. But for road races, I think Paris's idea of making it mandatory for anyone slower than 2:50 is too extreme. I would be much more amenable to it if the cutoff was 4:00. I feel like that's roughly the slowest time where people are seriously targeting a specific time, rather than their goal being just to finish.

Chicago's optional refill stations will be interesting to watch, but seem ultimately pointless. I doubt they'll see much use.

[-] markstos@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Which is more annoying: Running three hours to miss a 3-hour goal by one minute or running four hours to miss a 4-hour goal by one minute?

[-] Zagorath@quokk.au 3 points 3 days ago

I don't think the question matters, because it's based on target time. Both of those people would be allowed to grab a cup.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2026
8 points (90.0% liked)

Running

3694 readers
22 users here now

A place for runners.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS