955
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It was higher sure, but anthropic also has some of the most expensive models out there. That cost could be 5x-10x less just by going with cheaper model providers (if one were to pay the API costs, not the case for bun).

bun 1.4 was released 3 weeks ago, btw

[-] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

That cost could be 5x-10x less just by

My point was that it was cost of model rewrite by agents + 3 months worth of coding by lots of people.

5k open PRs atm + 3.5k open issues. I have no idea what is the state of Bun right now, but I am not confident in it.

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't think there was a lot of people working on the rewrite. Most PRs are from bots. Original estimates for a manual rewrite were a small team working for a year or so, which puts total costs over $1M. Even doubling the token cost estimates, it was still cheaper than doing it manually by a factor of 2x-3x

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
955 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

33210 readers
374 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS