955
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] qaz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We now have the ability to let Copilot review a PR on Azure DevOps, if someone sends a PR by Copilot I send Copilot right back at it

[-] EowynCarter@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yep.

We have one PR still blocked. Last change is a simple comment from me “Why ?”

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

The most important question that every change must answer.

[-] Daywim@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Merge that shit, watch it all collapse, enjoy your forever holiday

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 13 points 2 days ago

"So, Daywim. Why did you let this obviously aweful PR pass your desk causing so much trouble for our company? I'm afraid we have to let you go because of this questionable performance." - Corporate

[-] EffortlessEffluvium@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 days ago

What part of forever holiday did you miss?

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago

I interpreted it as "Holiday that lasts forever because the company can't work anymore" but I guess it is meant to mean "Holiday that lasts forever cause you got fired"?

[-] Daywim@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Yes it was meant to mean fired

[-] ATPA9@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago

"Looks like I overlooked something in this 6k PR full of im meaningless dribble. Why don't you ask the person who comitted the code how he overlooked this bug. Its his respinsibility"

Just throw the the slop creator under the bus.

[-] rethnor@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

Throw them under the bus by rejecting their PR. Integrity is your responsibility, the gesture is theirs. They'll get shit for not getting their stuff done.

[-] notabot@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

If you're the reviewer you share responsibility if there's an issue with the PR. Hopefully your teams culture is such that issues like that are treated as a learning experience, rather than a reason to pile on the individuals involved.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] flb@reddthat.com 28 points 2 days ago

Our PR checks auto reject the PR if it has 1k changes

[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

is it auto reject, or just doesn't auto approve and leaves it open for manual review

It seems weird that you can't do a pr at all with 1000 line changes, any moderate size feature addition could hit that mark

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 99 points 3 days ago

Repeat after me: "Rejected. Reason: too large of a change for one PR."

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 116 points 3 days ago

Don't worry half of those will be useless code comments

[-] kubica@fedia.io 126 points 3 days ago

// Here I'm not using that other thing that is now completely irrelevant, but I'll leave a comment to the non-existing thing anyway because I'm avoiding it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 days ago

We've had a very recent uptick in engineers submitting PRs of hundreds of lines across multiple files, for Jira tickets that only asked for a one-line change. The engineers involved have been using AI assistants for nearly two years now, but there seems to have been a change in the last month or so in how aggressive the new models are at changing code.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 56 points 2 days ago

Almost as if they're paid by the token...

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

This is exacty what I'm seeing. I've been using it in a DevOps capacity to act on runbooks. The same wrote task 3 months ago now consume 4-5x more tokens. this correlated closely with when anthropic released auto mode.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 87 points 3 days ago

The problem with Claude is that it doesn't write code to be modular & reusable. Every tiny change requires a complete rewrite.

[-] veryblandusername@fedinsfw.app 68 points 3 days ago

I've completely banned any code that can't be explained. I've had my CTO send me code at 3 AM to implement and when I ask him what I'm looking at he just says it doesn't need review, just push it.

Uhh, no sir, I'm not doing shit because you've handed me GCC and we're MSVC.

After I bitched endlessly to the CEO about that he said I have final say on what goes into the project.

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 27 points 2 days ago

I've had my CTO send me code at 3 AM

I hope you don't even respond until your next normal working hours!

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Solemarc@lemmy.world 95 points 3 days ago

I struggle to review a 1k line change. When people give me such big changes I normally don't believe they've reviewed them either.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago

That's because they haven't.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 56 points 2 days ago

No

You ask your LLM of choice to look it over, completing the shit-cycle

[-] Supercrunchy@programming.dev 16 points 2 days ago

I fully expect this to become the new normal being pushed by management.

"We identified PR reviews to be blocking our newfound AI-powered efficiency, so we are now mandating all the reviews to done by AI. Also we figured all the developers are now useless since all you do is ask Claude to solve tickets, so you are all fired"

I wonder how long it takes for the first high profile disaster happening because of a policy like that.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] JordanZ@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago

I honestly wish for a PR this size. One of the ones that came across this week was 813 commits, +17K -2K.

Of the 250 commits that GitHub was willing to show it had 35 other PRs merged into this massive one. Why they thought one giant PR was somehow better I’ll never know.

Of course…high priority, please review and merge immediately. Like guys it’s gonna take me a week to make sense of this.

[-] mattreb@feddit.it 4 points 1 day ago

If you can digest a 17k lines of code from someone else in 1 week you're either delusional or a beautiful mind, I would close such PR immediately but it would still ruin my day

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 2 days ago

That's an automatic reject from me, that's not a patch, it's an overhaul

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AdamBomb@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

🛑 Changes requested

Too big. Break into smaller individual PRs.

[-] rounding_error@lemmy.today 42 points 3 days ago
[-] Mac@mander.xyz 38 points 3 days ago

Let's Go Topple the Monarchy!

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 days ago

Let's Gamble, Try Merging is my favourite

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yessikg@fedia.io 31 points 2 days ago

If you can't be bothered to write your own code, I can't be bothered to review

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

No Mr Bond, i expect you to approve

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
955 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

33210 readers
711 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS