813
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] abos@piefed.social 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Isn’t Patagonia basically pristine and undeveloped because it is very remote and hard to develop. And from that highway documentary I remember also big parts are private property

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 10 points 15 hours ago

big parts are private property

Surely that makes them easier to buy and develop on than if they were publically owned? Or am I missing your point?

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

Big sales are easier with consolidated ownership vs disaggregated ownership.

If you need all 1000 acres to get from point a to point b to build something but requires 1000 different people to individually agree it may be next to impossible compared to needing 30 government officials to agree.

There is a reason eminent domain is used so much in the US vs private transactions for large projects. The Dakota access pipeline for example could be done through private purchases, but it's basically so impossible that not approving forced government sales through eminent domain was consider "blocking" it.

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
813 points (98.8% liked)

Work Reform

17513 readers
1530 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS