96

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/70841923

And among tech oligarchs, Bezos is all too typical. Peter Thiel, for one, once revealed that his three best ideas for achieving true freedom are “cyberspace”, “outerspace” and “seasteading” (the idea of building new countries on floating oil rigs). In other words, this man, whose enormous wealth affords him access to the most spectacular settings our planet has to offer, actually believes these three cold, dead places are superior to the Earth we have, verdant and alive.

Something similar seems amiss with Elon Musk, a man who seems to look up at the wonders of the night sky and see only opportunities to fill that inky unknown with his own space junk. The venerable novelist Joyce Carol Oates highlighted these apparent limits in the fall of 2025 when she roasted him ruthlessly on his own platform, X.

“So curious,” she wrote, “that such a wealthy man never posts anything that indicates that he enjoys or is even aware of what virtually everyone appreciates – scenes from nature, pet dog or cat, praise for a movie, music, a book (but doubt that he reads); pride in a friend’s or relative’s accomplishment; condolences for someone who has died; pleasure in sports, acclaim for a favorite team; references to history. In fact he seems totally uneducated, uncultured. The poorest persons on Twitter [X] may have access to more beauty & meaning in life than the ‘most wealthy person in the world.’”

The observation clearly got under the tech baron’s notoriously thin skin: he called her “a lazy liar” and began posting approvingly about various movies to prove Oates wrong.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Life is an abomination only capable of being created in specific conditions.

"Abomination" is your reaction to the phenomenon.

One could just as easily say, "Life is a miracle only capable of being created in specific conditions."

But I prefer to avoid demonizing or glorifying natural phenomena. Life is a result of natural processes.

[-] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

So natural thats why there are so many planets full of life. Its a lucky coincidence based on very specific set conditions. You’re more likely to get hit by a lightning bolt than you are to get a natural sequence that leads to life. It’s a sliver of a fraction. Abomination isnt always negative just your bias human perspective leads to it being negative.

[-] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Saying it's not natural because it's so rare isn't logical in the slightest. By that metric super massive black holes are also unnatural.

[-] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

So natural thats why there are so many planets full of life. Its a lucky coincidence based on very specific set conditions. You’re more likely to get hit by a lightning bolt than you are to get a natural sequence that leads to life. It’s a sliver of a fraction.

We have a very limited sample size.

Abomination isnt always negative just your bias human perspective leads to it being negative.

You might want to check the definition of "abomination".

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2026
96 points (99.0% liked)

Excellent Reads

3681 readers
122 users here now

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Rules:

  1. Common Sense. Civility, etc.
  2. Server rules.
  3. Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Other comms that might be of interest:

  1. !boardgames@sopuli.xyz
  2. !norway@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS