72
It is time to build the United States of Europe
(elpais.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
72 points (90.9% liked)
Europe
11999 readers
693 users here now
News and information from Europe ๐ช๐บ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Shouldn't it be about time to form the united earth government and start reaching for the stars?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Earth
What's your favourite?
I'm partial to the first one, just maybe mute the colours a bit:
I'm rather amused that there's no land there. I'm sure there's lots of reasons, like not being able to accurately put all landmass on there, there being arguments about why certain landmass is the focal point etc. but without any land it feels like the flag belongs to the oceans.
"Screw the landlubbers, they only cause problems anyway."
Maybe by the time we have a world government there won't be any land for people to get uppity about.
Yes, you are right. The EU has proven so far to be a good start, as it's been a decent compromise between the great powers and the smaller countries. Getting that balance right is really hard, as the clusterfuck that is the UN proves.
Sure. And I mean country size wouldn't even be an issue since we're getting rid of the concept of countries. It'd be one earth. At the size of the earth. (And maybe a few separatist regions. ๐ )
Why would a united Earth government get rid of countries? At the very least the borders make for convenient administrative zones to manage, but more than that I think it would be a monumental task to convince someone to consider themself an Earthican before being a member of their home country right off the bat. My understanding is that in past unification periods such as the early US or Italy it took a couple generations before someone would stop introducing themself as a Pennsylvanian and start introducing themself as an American.
I think world tensions/hostilities are too high for this to happen soon, but the way I foresee things is over the next many decades countries will form greater regional collections like the EU and then those regional groups will eventually form a council of 6-7 world powers that govern the planet as a whole. By that point maybe a person will refer to themself as a North American/Oceanian/etc. before calling themself Canadian or Indonesian, but it will be a slow process.
It sure will be.
I mean I'm from Central Europe. From ethnicity you probably can't tell if someone is from my country or one of the neighbouring ones. And culture here in Germany also varies a lot. Do I feel more connected to someone in the south of my own country, than to someone a few kilometers away in a seperate country? I'm not sure. I don't think so.
I mean saying things like "I'm from the USA" is nice and all. But I bet I'm going to ask a follow-up question immediately, because it's such a vast and diverse country. So I think we might as well skip that step and directly go for the region?!
Dunno. The borders as we have them feel pretty arbitrary to me. And I really like the perks we got here with Europe and the Schengen Area. I can just go whereever I like, go shopping, a weekend trip and don't need to care at all. No border controls, no worrying about how much alcohol and cigarettes I bring. I can pay in the same currency. Don't need to worry about roaming cost on my smartphone... I think it's awesome to not have borders.
Now we could as well get rid of the remaining stuff I do need to worry about when crossing borders. And I guess we could save a lot of money by getting rid of redundancy in administration. We could also pool money for military stuff and whatever. Which is probably going to be way more effective than everyone doing their own thing.
Also makes it easier for business. I mean as of now you need to abide by all kinds of different standards in different countries, get your product re-certified in imperial units to make some lunatics happy... That's just wasted effort IMO.
I mean we could keep them as administrative zones. But we'd keep all the craziness baked in like towns with the border randomly traversing them. Someone's living room being in a different administrative zone than the kitchen, enclaves, borders separating a cultural identity and mushing them together with other people based on politics and religion...