436
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
436 points (99.1% liked)
PC Gaming
15497 readers
865 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
All semiconductors are up because the same fabs make it all.
Further, hardware producers are likely starting to look at the "new normal" of ever-increasing prices as a reason to be extra conservative on pricing, because pricing for this moment sets them up to have to increase the price if costs continue to rise, turning customers off even more.
I suspect it was $500-600.
They didn't commit to anything beyond "below Index" when they first talked about it. My guess is also around $800. It's not an insignificant amount of engineering. They also hint at having made additional hardware tradeoffs due to RAM price explosions, so they would've been spending more elsewhere (probably on the display)