909

Doublespeak

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

You’re kind of right, Citizens United did not rule that corporations are people.

That determination was made in the 1880s in Santa Clara County v Southern Pacific Railroad. Kind of, it was in a summary before the ruling, but (like Robert Bork’s essay that said true monopolies don’t exist and even if they did competition would destroy them and so antitrust action should only be taken if a merger will negatively impact consumers where “negatively impact consumers” is constrained to mean “raise prices in the immediate future”) it was treated as having the force of law.

https://uslawexplained.com/santa_clara_county_v_southern_pacific_railroad

[-] crashfrog@lemmy.world -2 points 12 hours ago

CU doesn’t rely on corporations being people. It relies on individuals having First Amendment rights.

[-] PokerChips@programming.dev 2 points 8 hours ago

If that's not the most white washing statement I've ever read...

[-] crashfrog@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

It’s not a ruling about the rights of corporations!

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
909 points (99.7% liked)

Work Reform

17538 readers
1122 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS