436
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
436 points (99.1% liked)
PC Gaming
15497 readers
882 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Making it do only tracking and streaming would still require at least some notable fraction of the current processing power, and most importantly they need all the bandwidth for even supporting high quality passthrough (especially with the color camera attached). They could've reduced RAM, gotten a CPU at maybe half or third of the performance, but that would still leave it more expensive than the Quest. Would that even be an interesting product?