623
The FBI Doubles Down on Easing ‘Bestiality’ Hiring Standards
(www.wired.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
623 points (99.1% liked)
Not The Onion
22489 readers
1361 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
The answer he was getting to is just as crazy. There were so many trafficked victims who were also forced into beastiality that ALSO want to be in the FBI there grew a need to update the policy. Like....what?
He can't give out FBI jobs to his fraternity alumni because they all had to fuck a pig as part of the initiation.
Yeah, they could have let victims in without letting abusers in, by simply adding the word "willingly". They did it this way though, specifically so they could let in the abusers for the reich they have planned.
Another comment connected dots for me, and consistent with: 'No more walking on eggshells': Hegseth vows to lift guardrails on military hazing, harassment
This is the pro-hazing administration, and maybe animal raping is part of some of their 'good old boy' hazing?
Obviously not sure, but it's at least a theory that has some rationale that otherwise seems impossibly pointless to change.
The applicant pool is so narrow we had to consider this limitation. It's sad applicants may have been forced to perform those acts either way though.
Because they’re only accepting applications from creeps they know.
I deleted this part of my post...I can't help but think this is one guy who wasn't ever part of trafficking.
https://vger.to/infosec.pub/post/52412767
I actually don't find it far fetched that people who were victimized may themselves want to prevent that from happening to others.
Me either, just that this specific item is so prevelant that we are having a public conversation around it. But also...I would have bias if this was my story which should preclude me from service. There is a specific person(s) that was part of the mass hiring recently that makes this current news is my guess. There is a name here.
If a woman who was forced into it by a gang wants to join the FBI to take these people down to keep other girls and women from having the same fate, why would you deny her?
Under the law, we do not criminalize or hold people to actions taken under duress. You can keep the policy and just qualify the action to having been done willfully. You don't need to allow abusers in to open the door for victims.
Ok? Do you not understand the policy change? You are under the impression that willful beastiality is now allowed in the FBI? If you believe that, why do you believe that? Are you ok with having unreliable information?
He just said that the policy disallowed the fucking dogs who had been victimized. Are you expecting sensibility on these policies? Are you for real?
Yes I believe 1000% that whatever stupid excuse he gave for this policy change, it will be used primarily to put more unqualified, criminal, deviants into positions of federal authority. That seems to be this administration's bread and butter. Look at ICE, look at several of Trumps cabinet picks and AG picks apart from his own adjudication for rape and association with Epstein. Do you think that the Patel FBI who protects Trump and all the other Epstein abusers has high moral standards for the quality of its hirees? Come on.
Dude, don't live your life like this. Stop believing every hyperbolic headline the media comes up with. The original policy was dumb and it's been corrected. Victims of coercion should not be disqualified from the FBI because the question being asked isn't nuanced enough.
And an abuse victim shouldn’t have ever been charged with it either.
Correct.
Because that's a strawman argument & doesn't happen in reality.
You seem to know so much about it, are you an FBI recruiter or do you work with victims of human trafficking? Because unless you've done at least one of those things, I can't see how you would have any knowledge from which to make such an assertion.
Giving fascists the benefit of the doubt is stupid & I refuse to do so. If Kash Patel told me the fucking sky was blue, I'd go outside to check.
So no, I don't fucking believe them, and you shouldn't either if you have more than two braincells to rub together. What I do know is there is at least one white supremacist group & one really nasty college club that are both reported to use bestiality as initiation rites to use the threat of blackmail to maintain control over their members. The only victims here in those cases are the animals.
Yes, I do believe you are that easily manipulated.
Fuck off, loser.