114
submitted 5 days ago by MashedHobbits@lemy.lol to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago

Iran has something the DPRK does not, though, Hormuz. It's essentially an economic nuke, though obviously it isn't as effective at preventing attack, it seems very effective at flipping the tides without inviting an actual nuke on them in retaliation like MAD doctrine would result in.

[-] JillyB@beehaw.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's sort of one-time-use though. Now that it's been used, the gulf states are building pipelines to bypass the gulf and vulnerable countries are taking the opportunity to decarbonize. If the straight opened tomorrow, these countries would continue those efforts to reduce their strategic vulnerability. It won't be as strong of a deterrent the second time around.

Also, a nuke is supposed to deter aggression. It didn't do that.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

It's not a 1 to 1, and the strait still provides a huge capacity for oil flow that pipelines do not have. Further still, the world is transitioning to solar (at greater and lesser rates), reducing the importance of pipelines anyways.

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
114 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2463 readers
1196 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS