372
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by tonytins@pawb.social to c/politics@lemmy.world

Rachel Maddow warned viewers on Monday that President Donald Trump plans to interfere with midterm election results, following the Supreme Court’s recent 7-2 ruling against his executive order instructing the US Postal Service (USPS) to block states from distributing and collecting mail-in ballots.

Trump’s order, which he signed last March, would’ve directed the USPS to refuse to deliver mail-in ballots to anyone whose information hadn’t been properly submitted to a new state citizenship list maintained by the federal government.


"Trump is counting on confusion, uncertainty, and a lack of confidence in the mail-in voting system to suppress voter turnout," she said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] goostaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

One thing I, as a Swede, am having a hard time understanding is the heavy reliance on mail-in voting. We just had our elections last Sunday and you couldn't even vote by mail, with the only exception being if you live abroad. Otherwise you are going to your designated voting location on the day with your voting card and ID, or to any of the early voting locations. Even with these rules we had a turnout of nearly 85%.

[-] MrOtingocni@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lol, bruh

Sweden: 450,295 km2 USA: .... 9,833,520 km2

We are 20x the size and very spread out. Mail in voting is a very efficient way to get it done. When it's done right.

Sweden has a population of 10 million. 10 of our states have populations well over that. Hell, California has 40 million people. Even with neighborhood voting stations it's a big procedure. The process itself isn't bad, about an hour or three, but the whole procedure of taking off work and getting there with thousands of others makes it a logistical circus.

Sweden is a beautiful country filled with intelligent and worldy people who have a functional government and solid social net.

54% of our population have a below 6th grade reading level. A quarter of our population is functionally illiterate.

Getting the majority of people to vote is like herding cats. Plus there are only two parties so many people feel disenfranchised. We used to have strong national values about doing our civic duty, but that has largely fallen out of favor. We are not an united people.

We are essentially the ultra-capitalist version of Russia and as advanced as much of our tech is, our civic services are 15 years behind the times.

If we could vote online, and were required to, many many things would be different.

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Election day is on a Tuesday. You don't necessarily get the day off work. I think they are open until 7, but I wouldn't know because I work 12 hour shifts 9 - 9 when I work. There is early voting but mail in just makes it so much easier. I can sit down and research all the candidates for each thing I am voting for.

And the mail in voting in Florida was great (strange to say something political in Florida was great, but it was). You opt in for mail in, then every election you can vote for, they have to send you a ballot. Sometimes you don't even know there is an election going on and you get the ballot and you can research and find out why, and make an informed vote.

It's just a system that makes sense and encourages more participation and allows for better engagement with your choices. So of course they are trying to dismantle it. It's still good in Florida, but now you get opted back out after every major election and you have to go and get yourself opted back in. Small hurdle but I'm sure people have forgotten.

[-] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Distance.

Australia does it as well. It’s fine as long as the system behind it is fair and well regulated.

That’s the issue they have. But yeah it’s distance, for one reason. Working away from home is another though most do an early or absentee vote here to get around that.

Edit: I also note local knowledge from who I think is an American about not getting a day off or on a weekend (like us) which only strengthens the reason to have postal votes.

[-] kgbbot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

So because the filthy evil vile people who are not part of team Republican and won't willingly vote against their best interests, Republicans have spent decades making it hard to vote. For example this round of Republican fuckery, Despite Trump literally mailing his vote in, Republicans fearing lots of Democratic votes via mail in voting, hoping those voter just won't be able to vote...wether because they physically manage to travel or too few places to vote..

Republicans tend to try to make it harder/illegal to stop them instead of trying to run on policies people would willingly vote for.

[-] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Part of the popularity in mail-in voting in recent years has been because a lot of fashy dudes like to hang out at polling places and threaten folks they don't think should be voting (e.g. women and racial minorities, etc).

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
372 points (97.9% liked)

politics

31286 readers
3112 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS