28

He's a bit of a prick but he's not wrong. I wonder what Rudd would think were he not currently a diplomat.

Both were pretty clear-eyed about the opportunities of working with China and the futility of standing against them given the insignificance of Australia as anything but a weapons platform for the imperial machine of the USA.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

Do you think the usa is? I think a state being a gentle giant is an absurd criteria to avoid getting into alliances with their primary antagonist that pits you against them in a war.

[-] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -2 points 4 days ago

who do you think is more likely to attack us, china or the usa?

if/when china invades democratic taiwan like it did hong kong, what do you think we should do? get the un involved? send a strongly worded letter?

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago

the US. Everything they do, they hurt us.
The US has threatened to invade Canada, Greenland, Mexico and Cuba, recently and currently have a pedo, rapist, felon as President (speaking volumes of it's voting ciitizens). We align with them in some horrific shit like the appaling genocide in Palestine

China has some argy bargy with The Philippines over some shoals in the south china sea, fucked over Tibet and has some border argy bargy with India and will take Taiwan at some stage.

The question of their invasion is ridiculous, they could invade Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and and Myanmar, Pakistan, India, Mongolia, Malaysia, Singapore and Bangladesh tomorrow if they wanted, they are literally next door. New Zealand, Fiji etc would offer zero resistance.

They have zero chance of invading and successfully holding Australia, Russia can't even walk into Ukraine and they are next fucking door.

The US cant be relied upon as an ally at all, it told Ukraine it would defend it if it gave up it's nukes, they said tough shit buddy when they were needed.

Should we be best buddies with China ?, of course not but they should be in the same category as say Vietnam

The only reason we'd even be a target is because of stupid shit like ANKUS and the endless US bases on our soil (in many ways, we're a colony if the US already)

China has zero reason to invade, we already sell them everything they want for way cheaper then an invasion would cost.

[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

They did not invade Hongkong the British had a 99 year lease and china had sovereignty.

You can not like that, or how reintegration was done, but it doesn't make it an invasion.

I'm not going to engage in good faith if you are going to be histrionic and disingenuous.

[-] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -1 points 4 days ago

who do you think is more likely to attack us, china or the usa?

if/when china invades democratic taiwan, what do you think we should do?

[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

That is invalid framing. I do not think it is likely that china will attack us, I think the alliances we are in and hosting usa military shit makes it more likely, I think it is fairly likely (say >2% in 50 years) that we will declare war on china.

[-] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 0 points 4 days ago
[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

You tell me, if you're confident in your opinion it must be because you've researched it a lot and are well informed about their military posture. why would they?

Be concrete, what would they gain? How much would it cost? How long would the war be? What would the attack look like? What forces would be involved?

I think you're operating in the idealism land of china bad us good evil vs good is why war. Can you actually state your position and reasoning in material terms?

[-] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

sorry no im of the belief that despite the usa being a backwards country lead by a retard, Australia culturally is far similar and closer (some would argue we are too close) to america than china

china as mildly as you’ve made them seem is still an authoritarian dictatorship, if criticising dickfingers carried the same penalty as criticising jingping lemmy would have been deleted and we’d all be dead or in jail

in terms of invasion it depends on how we respond to the invasion of taiwan, if we send a strongly worded letter then i assume we’ll largely be spared, but if we get involved i don’t know how it ends

but i would never ever underestimate the worlds second strongest army with the worlds strongest by far manufacturing capacity

[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

ah yes, vibes based geopolitical analysis

[-] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

which part do you think is most vibes

that we are culturally the same as americans

that taiwan is likely to be attacked by china

https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2026/08/24/fresh-off-major-defense-drills-taiwan-proposes-record-military-spending/

maybe you should go tell the taiwanese to chill out?

and how hard we are targeted depends on how deeply we get involved in the defence of taiwan?

We’re not impervious, we have been hit before

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Darwin

China is watching the russian invasion of ukraine and learning

[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

I love that your example of Australia being attacked is Australia being attacked because Australia declared war at the behest of another state.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2026
28 points (96.7% liked)

Australian Politics

1877 readers
18 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS