243

The former vice president will speak today on the topic, in advance of Climate Week and as President Trump lifts limits on greenhouse gas emissions from power plants.

Archived copy of the article

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pedz@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago

I was taught about global warming in the 90ies at school and have always been concerned about the environment and pollution. I'm from the generation that saw that Manbearpig episode, and even though I know South Park "makes fun of everyone", this one always seemed too much.

But I stopped giving a fuck during the pandemic when I realized that even a pandemic wouldn't change society.

We saw first hand how the environment could improve and benefit from making changes in our way of life, but most people wanted to go back to their commute and waste energy in traffic.

Even today, governments and public employers are still forcing their employees to go "back to the office" even if it's not needed for lots of jobs.

I care about the future of next generations, I have nephews and nieces, but apparently nobody gives a fuck because it would be too expensive and disruptive. We prefer cheap gas.

So I still maintain my lifestyle of not having a car and being careful when I can, but I was avoiding airplanes as they are the most polluting mode of transport, and I don't anymore.The majority apparently doesn't care and just wants cheap gas and cheap shit. They want to choke us while complaining everything is getting more expensive, amd won't change anything.

Every headline year after year is how we won't reach our climate "goals" and how we're passing thresholds one after the other.

So I don't give a fuck now. It's sad but I can see what people around me chose, and it's cheap gas and endless consumption.

[-] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yeah im kinda where you're at. As humans we know better but 99% of us just act like animals anyway. Just eat and consume as much as possible and fight anyone who gets in our way. That's basically what it comes down to, everyone knows burning oil and sending the smoke into the air is a bad idea long term, they just don't care.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

I'd argue that most people didn't want to go back to commuting at all but the owning class demanded it. The same people demand we build data centers now

[-] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

Regulation and organizational optimization could make the difference, but the incentives are "make as much money as possible, everything else be dammed", not, "Work towards a better and more functional society by guiding our future with sustainable humanitarian practices"

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 21 hours ago

Yeah I have to say I have been a doomer for awhile and honestly global warming was not even on my radar till the aughts. I mean environmentalism for awhile but not specifically the co2 problem. Feels that way anyway. What gets me is despite my doomerism I did not realize how bad it would be with the rich/powerful going nuts hoarding and pushing for more use of fossil fuels. Its like if we had done the best we could since the start of the millenium we were in for a rough ride and we consistantly stick pretty close to worse case.

[-] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

When given the option the population chooses consume more every single time. When you ask voters if Climate change matters a super majority says it does but when they rank it alongside other issues its at the bottom of the list, with things that will pollute more higher in the list. Politicians are reading that signal correctly, consume the planet because all the caring is purely performative. When it comes to protests to try and change the situation most people find themselves wanting the disruption to end, and thus join the polluters side. They don't actually care and their own behaviour shows that they don't. Humanity doesn't have a future, we are going to shoot on through to the worst case scenario and extinction.

[-] Kirk@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago

I'm glad to see you calling out that episode, as I was really confused by it when I was younger too. Al Gore wasn't in hysterics he was giving a boring power point presentation about a complicated topic. It just never sat right that they would make him out to be some kind of crackpot.

[-] Captain_Buddha@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

At least the creators went back and admitted they were wrong, by means of the same metaphor... albeit a bit late in the game for it to mean much.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2026
243 points (98.8% liked)

Climate

9006 readers
769 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS