972

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

The rumor mill that gave me most of what I know about this incident didn’t tell me that piece, so that’s why I’m “on about” not knowing what you know.

And here I assumed you'd read the same article we're both commenting under where they said as much. My mistake.

It would be interesting to see what would have happened had Macklemore spoke about Africa

No it wouldn't. We both know nothing would happen.

I think that’s lame. You do not.

Don't put words in my mouth. It's not going to get you anywhere.

As far as Macklemore is concerned, this is the best outcome possible. He gets tons of free publicity, and the topic he spoke about gets even more coverage as a result of what happened. And everytime Ed performs without his openers, the papers will talk about why that is.

[-] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

And here I assumed you’d read the same article we’re both commenting under where they said as much. My mistake.

Nope. Not everyone has infinite time like you do. Sorry to report I'm a mere mortal.

No it wouldn’t. We both know nothing would happen.

Yeah, again, I'm only a mortal so I lack the prescience that you possess. A thousand apologies for my limitations.

Don’t put words in my mouth. It’s not going to get you anywhere.

Then, pray tell, why are you saying what you're saying in this thread? I made a reasonable conclusion about your intent and you didn't even deny it (yet), nor clarify what your actual intent is. You just sass me for having wounded your ego.

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

While i do not doubt that you'd need infinite time to read a single article. I managed just fine in 2 minutes.

It's pretty clear what I've said for those who can read. And most of it seems to be because people like you type shit without even bothering to read what it is you're commenting on. Just going around spreading misinformation. But just for you. I'll use small words.

He just wants to sing and that's it. He did not want to get involved at all in this 'fight'. I think it's cowardly. Ed also has (or had) hundreds of people working for the tour. That may very well rely on the tour to bring home money. He has enough money to say fuck it and go home. Same can't be said for everyone else.

And don't worry, there's no ego to wound here.

Trying to waste others time by making them deny or defend against baseless claims is the type of shit Trump does. And the only measured response is to not even dignify it.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
972 points (98.2% liked)

politics

31142 readers
2889 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS