966

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 17 points 23 hours ago

“I have spent this week trying to build bridges, to find a solution and unfortunately, was unable to do so. I know who I am, both as a person and as an artist, and those who know my heart know my values too.”

His values

[-] Krumm@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its the funniest thing ever that the next place he has a concert is Philadelphia, a place known for its quiet and well behaved citizens, especially when they're in large groups.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

Ed Sheeran is weak, but Robert Kraft is the evil psychopathic billionaire who started all this.

A profound fuck to Robert Kraft in particular.

At least Sheeran isn't in the Epstein Files.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

A lot of singers like Roan Chapel ditched the agency Ed Sheeran was part of because the head was a huge Zionist. Ed stayed. Now we see the results.

[-] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Ed has more power than the venues and promoters. He isnt getting blacklisted from anywhere when he makes them as much money as he does. He doesnt even need balls to stand up to them. They need him.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

This is how you challenge their power. Assign consequence to compliance

[-] BigDiction@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Interesting how Ed Sheeran is the one getting dragged in the media and all over Lemmy while the literal billionaire who started this shit is probably getting rub and tugged in Florida right now.

As if I needed another reason to hate the Patriots.

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

If it was a clear and cut case of contract breach for the tour, that would be one thing. But it doesn't sound like that's what it was about. So Ed is getting dragged for not standing up for his fellow artist.

From what I've gathered, Ed pretty much just threw his hands up and said, "I don't want to get involved, you guys figure it out." Fair enough if that's the case. That's his choice. But we see the result of what people think about those who take the cowards way out.

He doesn't want to deal with politics. He just wants to perform. And I get that. But it's still cowardly to not stand up for your fellow artist. And that's why everyone else is dropping out.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago

Kinda like art is inherently a form of speech amd one that incites emotion, thought, and often rebellion. Any real artist knows where they stand. Sheeran sells a product. The others create music.

[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago

I’m sure he get get other acts to participate, like middle aged rock and the draft dodger/pants crapper dude whose name I forget.

[-] holy_scroller@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago
[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

You're describing everyone's MAGA uncle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Ed is such a bitch.

What is the point of fuck you money if you're always going to lick the boots of the Epstein class?

[-] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

It's rare that any rich person says, "Okay, this looks to be enough money/power. I'm done accumulating it."

Evidently, Ed Sheeran is not one of them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] caboose2006@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Boy, I bet he's regretting his "Both sides are bad" take

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

He's not taking a "both sides are bad" take. He's taking a "I don't want to deal with politics, I just want to perform".

[-] wittymcusername@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago

Going back a few days to Ed’s original statement:

“I am appalled by the conflict between Israel and Palestine. The suffering and pain caused on both sides is a human tragedy,” begins Sheeran in an Instagram post.

It’s at least a little bit of a “both sides are bad” take.

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, fair enough.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

Another racist, degenerate, billionaire backfire. Palestine is being talked about everywhere, big time! Thanks Mister Kraft! Sorry Ed, your career is dead. The New England Pedophiles indeed!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HotDayBreeze@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago

Ed Sheeran should have backed out of the Ed Sheeran tour in support of Palestine.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago

He really should have. Imagine how embarrassing it would be for the stadiums. I bet some of them would have changed their mind.

[-] Manjushri@piefed.social 171 points 2 days ago

“I have spent this week trying to build bridges, to find a solution and unfortunately, was unable to do so.

I tried so hard to find a middle ground between the genocide supporters and everyone else and I just can't seem to do it. People who hate genocide are just so rigid and uncompromising!

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 156 points 2 days ago
[-] criscodisco@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

“You get civil rights on paper and we put the klan behind badges.”

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Get this guy a Nobel peace prize!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The other Sheeran-level star signers are pretty quiet these days. Ed is taking a hit for them.

[-] wieson@feddit.org 39 points 1 day ago

Stupid of Sheeran and his team to assume that the IRISH backing band wouldn't care.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

If critizising genocide is antisemitism, then that word lost all meaning.

[-] pootzapie@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Especially since Palestinians are Semites

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

That's something they never cared about in Israel.

[-] Hazelnutcookiez@lemmy.blahaj.zone 83 points 2 days ago

Ed Sheeran Is definitely in the wrong too but man people need to direct this anger at the stadium owners too they are at fault too

[-] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ed Sheeran is worth $400 million and is one of the top 3 touring musicians bar none. He had every piece of power to say "fuck you" to Robert Kraft and in the moment where it mattered he was spineless.

I get that but again, this needs to be directed at Kraft too never said ed wasn't at fault

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

Kraft is a Zionist child molester with his own intelligence agency. People shouldn't need to be reminded that he is bad, but now we know Ed is bad too. That's the news

[-] 5765313496@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I hadn't heard of Robert Kraft before this, so I appreciate what Hazelnutcookiez is saying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ed showed us all that he considers himself more in line with those stadium owners then the rest of us though, so fuck him

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ed Sheeran has too much power and wealth to be gentle with. He's chosen the Zionist side even when his livelihood wouldn't be in jeopardy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Well, Ed started as a busker, alone with his guitar. Looks like he might end as one, just on a large stage in a stadium.

[-] CombatWombat@feddit.online 140 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I doubt many folks are viewing this through a sports lens, but as a Sounders fan I am very pleased to see the part owner of the Seattle Sounders (Macklemore) stand up for what’s right against the evil New England Revolution owner (Kraft).

load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
966 points (98.2% liked)

politics

31135 readers
2117 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS