973

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hazelnutcookiez@lemmy.blahaj.zone 83 points 3 days ago

Ed Sheeran Is definitely in the wrong too but man people need to direct this anger at the stadium owners too they are at fault too

[-] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ed Sheeran is worth $400 million and is one of the top 3 touring musicians bar none. He had every piece of power to say "fuck you" to Robert Kraft and in the moment where it mattered he was spineless.

[-] Hazelnutcookiez@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 days ago

I get that but again, this needs to be directed at Kraft too never said ed wasn't at fault

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago

Kraft is a Zionist child molester with his own intelligence agency. People shouldn't need to be reminded that he is bad, but now we know Ed is bad too. That's the news

[-] 5765313496@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I hadn't heard of Robert Kraft before this, so I appreciate what Hazelnutcookiez is saying.

[-] IamMoonPie@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

The people caping for Sheeran are hilarious. Do you truly not see why people are mad at him? That fence post up your ass must be impacting your critical thinking buddy.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 52 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ed showed us all that he considers himself more in line with those stadium owners then the rest of us though, so fuck him

Yes but I think you missed the "too" as in people need to be mad at both Ed and Kraft, most of the post I've seen mostly talk about ed.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

We're already mad at Kraft. We're mad at the billionaire class in general. Kraft's behavior is not novel. Ed's is. That's why his actions are getting more attention. We didn't know Ed would side with the enemy till now.

[-] Hazelnutcookiez@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A multi millionaire siding with more money is surprising?

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

After spending years cultivating his "regular guy" facade and doing shows in support of Ukraine, yes

[-] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ed Sheeran has too much power and wealth to be gentle with. He's chosen the Zionist side even when his livelihood wouldn't be in jeopardy.

[-] Hazelnutcookiez@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Never said to be gentle with ed just that this need be directed at both, Kraft is at fault too

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

By boycotting the concerts at their venues, you are directing anger at them, and hurting them financially.

His backing band and all opening acts pulling out means the tour should be cancelled, and that's hitting Kraft and other venue owners right where it hurts.

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Hurting rich people financially never ever makes them change who they are.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

We need more effective methods

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

No, not one off events. Sustained boycott is the only way, I don't give a single penny to any of these assholes, and I know other artists will play the venues and lots of people who were outraged about this will attend at those same venues. I don't count on them anyway, they will continue to live life like their actions have no consequence, and pointing out that Kraft and other billionaires are bad won't change that.

It's not like we need more people to know what billionaires are bad, only the braindead don't realize that. We've reached peak awareness, everyone knows what's going on.

That's why I believe it's more effective to point your fingers at the person willingly taking the fall for money. The pressure on Sheeran and the fallout will hopefully translate to other celebrities realizing that cowardice is not an acceptable option for them. That can translate to artists boycotting the venues (even out of self preservation).

Of course it doesn't change who they are, but it can effect their ability to suppress the truth.

[-] wpb@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Won't someone please think of the business owners? 🥺

[-] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

We don’t expect decency from them

Sheeran tries to sell his image on it

[-] robin@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 days ago

Ed is the one who spent tens of millions pre-paying semi trucks, Staff, Equipment, consultants on stage design, Travel and lodging and logistics. He apparently fronts the money for his own tours. People are hired, contracts are signed, things are scheduled and paid for. I don’t envy Ed. He’s not in the financial or legal position to simply cancel like the others are.

Robert Kraft is the bad guy here. Changing the rules on what musicians can play and can’t play. Art versus censorship is a tale as old as time. The industry needs to fight back, the fans need to stand up, but I don’t think we should take it all out on Ed here. I got the vibe he wants to be on the right side, but he’s too deep right now and counting on the tour dates to cover his expenses.

Where he messed up big-time was not hiring a crisis manager before he put out that defensive statement. He said some good things, but in the wrong tone, and I think people are reacting to the tone more than anything else.

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

I think ed is a shithead and can get fucked.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
973 points (98.2% liked)

politics

31153 readers
3105 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS