341
submitted 3 days ago by Sibbo@sopuli.xyz to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I know that I can simply make my own private certificate authority that only I and my family trust. But is there some public provider like letsencrypt that is in a free-er part of the world than the US?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] diecknet@discuss.tchncs.de 110 points 3 days ago

There are some commercial Certificate Authorities that offer free certificates. But in contrast Let's Encrypt is a non-profit.

  • ZeroSSL (Austria)
  • Actalis (Italy)
[-] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago

Also the controlling party in Italy is practically neo-fascist and Austria is also sliding there again with their Nazi party like AfD in Germany and VB in Belgium getting a huge portion of votes.

I don't see how it is that much better than a US non- profit.

I think the core thing is that you have to know of a bunch of different CA options and switch when necessary or on a compromised CA.

[-] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The thing is, the US is already fascist. Austria (current day) would be an improvement.

Also, you know the downfall of Autistici/Inventati - No - check my post history. One of the events that happened is that US owned PIR removed one of the domain names since they own .org. One less US entity, one less point of failure.

[-] philpo@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

Both Italy and Austria are EU member states , fall under the GDPR AND NIS2 and while both government(even under the FPÖ) have their downsides neither has legislation that is even remotely close to what the US even have today (and had for decades) and unlike the US both countries still have a very well working judical system and the ECJ.

So. Yes. While not perfect, their situation is massively better than a US non for profit. Total different league. Not even in the same ballpark.

[-] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 4 points 1 day ago

It is. Most EU countries build on a strong legal system of separation of powers etc. that makes it hard to dismantle democracy with the alacrity MAGA is currently doing it in the USA.

But nevertheless, we're all aware of the rise of fascism in Europe and are extremely worried.

[-] crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub -1 points 1 day ago
[-] philpo@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

And you must not have read the relevant US laws.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

commercial

free certificates

How do they make money?

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 35 points 2 days ago

Usually they make money with extended certificates where they not only offer a certificate for example.com but also certify that it belongs to Example Ltd.

Those extended certificates used to show the company name next to address bars, but I don't think browsers do that anymore.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

a certificate for example.com

also certify that it belongs to Example Ltd.

I thought that was the whole point of a certificate, to show that the website belongs to the company? Or nah?

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 31 points 2 days ago

Nah, the point is to encrypt the traffic and tell you what you are receiving really comes from example.com and not an evil third party.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Ah, right. That's the primary purpose, thank you for the reminder! 🙏

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

It's actually to prove that a web server belongs to (or is trusted by for delivering their content) a specific website.

qualified certificates go a step further, by proving that a web server belongs to a specific company or a real person. but that's costly, because verification is inherently more difficult.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the additional details!

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

ZeroSSL is probably what OP is looking for

[-] 123@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I thought zerossl used let's encrypt behind the scenes (for their free certs at least).

Edit: they don't mention that on their website, perhaps they don't.

[-] pdl@social.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

@123 @possiblylinux127 ZeroSSL nutzt wohl die Sectigo-Infrastruktur. Also auch ein Amerikaner im Rücken, der den Stecker ziehen kann.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
341 points (96.0% liked)

Selfhosted

62252 readers
869 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS