I think what's being pointed out is that it's not that black and white, and the argument you are using has been coopted and used as propaganda. As a part of critical thinking, we should be able to question everything we believe, in such a way as to disregard it. Do you accidentally have a bias because you've believed this your whole life, is a good question to ask. I'm not saying you're wrong or right, I do have an opinion on that, but I'm not expressing that right now, and I'm not talking about the premise, but the active ability to oppose your own thinking. Could you, (for any topic) put both or the many factors on the table in front of you and are you capable of rejecting beliefs you thought were inherent. It's something we all need to learn, with the co-opting of ingrained beliefs by orchestators of propaganda.

My opinion, no I don't think on average women and men are comparable like that. You're thinking of the idealised and top athletes, of both, and you're imagining an equal standing throughout thier lives to become the athletes. That doesn't exist. If the same athlete men had the societal pressures and responsibilities that had to also keep up, would that not shave a few seconds off their time. Does muscle structure make a difference, maybe. Maybe not. Height? Are we just judging running and running alone? Wouldn't that skew the results. That doesn't seem to be a varied comparison, that seems cherry picked. Women's and men's competitions used to be combined, until the men kept getting butt hurt at losing to a woman. Which events, I can't remember. It's more that the thought brings questions to answer. We should always be questioning what we believe, and be flexible enough to improve upon our knowledge.