333
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) by ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to c/linux@programming.dev

Direct link to the LLM Policy Discussion: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-workspace/-/work_items/187

And all of this is coming right after the debacle with an AI slop project being allowed to give a presentation at Akademy, and the person asking how this was allowed being blocked by KDE:

https://lemmy.nz/post/42029517

as well as the discussion thread bringing up legitimate concerns about AI usage being closed:

https://discuss.kde.org/t/sorry-to-bring-up-a-contentious-topic-kde-ai-llm-policy/46333/164

As someone who genuinely loves KDE, and has even donated to the project multiple times, I sadly have to accept that the majority of KDE have hopped onto the Pro-AI train, and they will not be dissuaded otherwise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

BSD has a libertarian energy to its culture, so I suspect they will be vibing a lot too.

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 days ago

AFAIK NetBSD is explicitly rejecting AI contributions.

[-] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That and OpenBSD's Theo de Raadt is rejecting LLM code based on copyright arguments (not "respect author" but rather "we get sued" kind of point), here's an example (click "next in thread" a bunch of times if you want).

Though back in 2001 he claimed the songs on the CDs were "as free as everything else" (no), but like meh.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
333 points (87.9% liked)

Linux

15024 readers
386 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS