78
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
78 points (98.8% liked)
Technology
43598 readers
301 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
You are far too credulous. First strikes are some of the most deeply and throughly planned operations in a campaign. They knew exactly which apartments to go after, but we think they used a.i.?
Also, bombing schools is something the US has down in nearly every single campaign in the last 20 years and those were planned without a.i. So now we're supposed to believe they used a totally different planning technique and got the exact same result? And then double tapped it?
I think you may have too high expectations about the motivation and work ethics of the average office worker. Just because they're job is too decide who to kill does not mean they are extra careful about that. Killing is part of the job after all.
Average office workers aren't involved in planning military first strikes in some of the most consequential campaigns in history. You're stretching incredibly to try to paint the easily recognizable pattern of deliberate US war crimes as unwitting incompetence and it's pretty gross