333
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) by ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to c/linux@programming.dev

Direct link to the LLM Policy Discussion: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-workspace/-/work_items/187

And all of this is coming right after the debacle with an AI slop project being allowed to give a presentation at Akademy, and the person asking how this was allowed being blocked by KDE:

https://lemmy.nz/post/42029517

as well as the discussion thread bringing up legitimate concerns about AI usage being closed:

https://discuss.kde.org/t/sorry-to-bring-up-a-contentious-topic-kde-ai-llm-policy/46333/164

As someone who genuinely loves KDE, and has even donated to the project multiple times, I sadly have to accept that the majority of KDE have hopped onto the Pro-AI train, and they will not be dissuaded otherwise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

You can reject it in your own projects. That's about it. If you're open source and accepting any submissions, you've no idea if they're LLM generated or not.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 19 hours ago

You have no idea if they copy pasted proprietary code either, but you try your best to keep it out.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Except for all the open source libraries you probably use that also use LLMs, or you find a blog post someone wrote explaining how to do something and they used LLMs

You can avoid direct knowledgeable usage, but you'll still have LLM code in your codebase.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
333 points (87.9% liked)

Linux

15024 readers
1080 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS