1309
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Steve@communick.news -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why not?
Company ownership is already broken into shares. There's no law of nature or logic that dictates how those shares are distributed. There are all sorts of ways to divide them between capital investors, labor investors, even outside stake holders like customers, suppliers, even simple neighbors. Any individual may be a labor investor in one company, and a capital investor in others. That one person would embody both your bourgeois and proletarian classes.

Again large economies are too complex for simple, clean, universal solutions. Their complexity necessitates more complex thinking.

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
1309 points (98.3% liked)

Work Reform

17706 readers
1736 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS