35
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
35 points (88.9% liked)
Fedia Discussions
1 readers
2 users here now
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
So...you agree that he wasn't involved in founding the company. He just likes to say he was, "on paper".
They aren't even "reinventing" what the term "founder" means...they're just calling him one, even though he didn't actually "found" the company.
This isn't hard to understand. These mental gymnastics you keep going through in order to avoid the truth, is really weird to watch. It's like out-of-control copium.
So yes, Eberhard and Tarpenning were there at the beginning. But Tesla’s own historical descriptions have also recognized Musk and others as part of the broader founding team. The disagreement is really about what we mean by “founder,” not about whether Musk was involved in Tesla’s early creation.
I think we’re actually closer on the facts than you realize. I never said Musk founded Tesla by himself or that he was there from day one. My point is that reducing his role to simply “being on paper” is also inaccurate. He joined very early, led the Series A investment, became chairman, and played a major role in shaping the company that Tesla became
No, we're not actually closer on "the facts". You're still operating on a set of "alternative facts" that are contradicted by the actual historical timeline.
Musk was an early investor in a company that was already founded by other people. That is a very important distinction between reality and the fiction that Musk wants people to believe.