485
submitted 1 month ago by chobeat@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CarnistClownKiller@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Nice! Remember, if you're anti-AI data centers for environmental reasons, you should also be vegan. Animal agriculture is a much larger plague on the environment.

Edit: downvoted by animal abusers suffering from cog diss lol

[-] PushButton@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago
[-] CarnistClownKiller@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 weeks ago

Try for even longer and reduce your risk of diabetes, high BP and heart disease. Reduce your environmental impact and cease abusing animals for pleasure. It's a fantastic way to live, my brother.

[-] spud@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

cease abusing animals for pleasure

no one is doing that

Don't forget to eat your bean soup.

I love these kinds of comments because it reminds me that animal abusers don't have a leg to stand on. I will eat any food i want because there are sufficient vegan alternatives for everything that don't require animal abuse and rights violations :) thanks

[-] spud@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

we need to eat. we don't need corporations

[-] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It seems like this person with the murder meat eater name isn't quite sane. I have read that vegans suffer from shrinking of their brains, and I strongly believe it when I see them shouting online

Also this is in a thread about vandalism against AI data centres. I wonder what made that guy think it was a place for diet warfare

[-] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Industrial agriculture is bad whether it makes beef or broccoli

Unfortunately we need it to feed us all. Regenerative agriculture (which builds soil) is much better and requires stock animals

Animal agriculture is much worse and you're just coping if you say different. We would use 75% less land if we stopped farming animals. We would reduce 14% of our GHG emissions. We would see a substantial reduction in our use of fresh water reserves. And most importantly, we could not exploit and murder 80 billion land animals annually, who have a right to life just like we do.

We do not need to eat animals, so that's incorrect. Equating animal agriculture to plant agriculture is something only an ignorant person would do.

[-] spud@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

We would use 75% less land if we stopped farming animals.

I doubt it

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
485 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

89269 readers
4448 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS