view the rest of the comments
Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
That clearly didn't come out of nowhere. They were already arguing for some amount of time. I'd appreciate more context of what lead to that before I make any judgement.
Yeah i really don't know if i should side with tge guy who has his skull smashed in or the coward who did it and drove away. Maybe the cyclist called him a pussy, or even worse.
You aren't? That's odd. Who else would you side with?
What makes the criminal a coward? The driving away? Would it be brave for him to stay, waiting to be arrested? Or is that just some dismissive rhetoric?
The context is that throwing someone to the ground like that is illegal even when you've been arguing for a while
That's certainly a fact that it's illegal; Almost no matter the context. It could be considered part of the broader environmental context. Like it's not raining.
But I'm more looking for the actions of the three people involved, during the several minutes leading up to the head slamming. Longer possibly. Maybe one or more of them has a criminal history.
Yeah, man. We gotta find if the victim is to blame, here.
/s
What the hell, man?
look at this fucking cyclist violently standing still there listening the women screams!!!
I'm sure he ran a red light once! Also the poor people stand no chance against this heavy bicycle
Not to blame him. To understand why. Attacks like that don't just happen in a vacuum.
Why were they stopped in the middle of the road? How long had they been arguing? What we're they arguing about? Did they know each other prior to this encounter? Should there also be traffic tickets, in addition to the criminal charges? We know literally nothing about the event. Why is everyone satisfied with ignorance?
Right, they happen when entitled motor vehicle drivers feel disrespected. The cyclist may have even done something stupid beforehand that put everyone in that car in danger.
But it almost certainly doesn't matter, because there is almost nothing that cyclist could have possibly done that would justify the violence in that video.
I think that's why no one here seems to care.
I'd say there's absolutely no justification. Even if the cyclist killed the man's wife first, it wouldn't justify it. But it would make it understandable.
As it is there's no way to understand what happened. And everyone seems content assuming they do.
Uh, no. That's a load of horseshit.
Revenge is horseshit.
It's literally just "I hurt them because they made me feel bad". That's never a justification.
It is actually justification, you just choose not to accept it.
So it is okay to hurt people if they make you feel bad.
That's scary.
Murdering someone's wife isn't "making them feel bad" .
How would it make them feel?
It would make me feel bad.
To cyclists, they really do just happen in a vacuum. I've been fortunate to only get heckles and honks in my area while riding
Not to the people doing the attacking, they don't
Piss off you absolute bell-end
There's an article, and it's as I expected:
Why would you assume anything different?
I wouldn't assume at all. That's what everyone else is doing.
And the "without provocation" is almost certainly wrong. People don't act like that without some internal reason. Better phrasing would be "without any known provocation".
With the various responses, I get the impression that people assume any known reason would be a justification. As if reason itself is a justification. Of course that's not true at all.
I don't know if you've done much cycling on public roads, but your mere existence is enough 'provocation' for some of these nutjobs.
I have. It's a part of why I stopped almost 20 years ago.
But still that's just guessing. We don't know much of anything that happened here.
We know enough to know that nothing justifies that kind of response.
Honestly, I too would like to see the events leading up to it, but I accept that's unlikely to happen. In my view, as soon as a driver gets out of their car to do anything except exchange details after a crash, they've lost any moral high ground regardless, if they had any in the first place.
Of course not. Nothing would justify it. But explain it? Sure. Maybe there was an understandable reason for it, beyond bad impulse.
No.
No, what?
:sigh: Let me spell out for you, then.
That's one of the most fucking stupid things I've ever read on Lemmy, and that's saying something.
So then, what's the reason?
Is "bad impulse" all there is?
You're absolutely assuming, because you assume the article is wrong to make up your own interpretation of events.
Sometimes motorists are just jackasses that want to hurt cyclists. That's a real thing that happens.
The article isn't wrong. It never states any reason. It never makes an assumption beyond saying it was unprovoked. The article is quite factual realy.
It's everyone else here who's assuming the man's state of mind, motivation, and sanity even. I'm not assuming you all are wrong. But I'm also not assuming any of you are right. Because the article has no information about your judgments.
What context could possibly make it ok for the ecocidal narcissist to assault the cyclist?
You don't need any more context than what's in the video to know that this shitbag need the dildo of consequences to arrive unlubed and covered in sandpaper.
No context would make it okay. If the cyclist was a mass murderer who killed the man's entire home town, it still wouldn't be okay.
But while we can acknowledge it's bad no matter what, we also might be able to understand his reaction reaction.
Just shut the fuck up. Quit saying dumb shit like this
It's just true. The vindictive mindset is a primordial cognitive disease.