94
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sys110x@aussie.zone 70 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's really difficult to cool things in space, and it's really difficult to power stationary things in space. It's also really expensive to put things in space so size/weight is a problem.

So if it's not cheaper/better for cooling, and it's not cheaper/better for power, and it's not cheaper/better for rack space.. why is there a focus on shipping compute to space?

The point I keep coming back to is that it's really hard for the public to protest/damage/destroy data centres in space.

[-] asmoranomar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The only legitimate thing I can think of is that if we ever colonize the moon or mars, we are going to need compute and storage at the location. If we can launch equipment into orbit instead of waiting until it's needed then it'll give a headstart to test different solutions. If we can also figure out how to do that without having to build it or maintain it on the moon/mars, then that might result in less risk. But it's all conjecture and you don't know what you don't know unless you try.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 48 points 2 days ago

I think its simpler than that, its just stock price pumping. They can tell the plebs that they have the tech to put servers in space, and the plebs will eat it up and pump the stock.

You can still destroy the terrestrial base stations.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

No laws and regulation in space.

But too bad, the customers aren't also in space!

[-] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 13 points 2 days ago

It's extremely difficult from a cooling perspective IIRC, way more than on earth. Like you have to vent into a near vacuum, which is one of the best insulators.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You have to radiate it. If you vent, you run out of whatever medium you're using to cool in a few minutes.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Even if they could pull it off, the data transmission speed would be sooooo bad relative to what it would take to ingest insane amount of data and then regurgitate it back.

[-] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

On the other hand, how easy is it to swap out a rack after a fault?

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

with a new satellite data center.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

If they're putting the date centres in space I am going to problem with them anymore.

[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I think you a word

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
94 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

88259 readers
3136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS